Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39061074›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2024

Health and disability - a multi-group latent class analysis of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 among those with mental and physical health conditions.

Vanessa Seet, Edimansyah Abdin, Anitha Jeyagurunathan, Tan Sing Chik, Lum Joon Kit, Lee Eng Sing, Swapna Verma, Wei Ker-Chiah, Pamela Ng, Mythily Subramaniam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vanessa SeetResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Buangkok Green Medical Park, 10 Buangkok View, Singapore, 539747, Singapore. ai_ling_seet@imh.com.sg.
Edimansyah AbdinResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Buangkok Green Medical Park, 10 Buangkok View, Singapore, 539747, Singapore.
Anitha JeyagurunathanResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Buangkok Green Medical Park, 10 Buangkok View, Singapore, 539747, Singapore.
Tan Sing ChikResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Buangkok Green Medical Park, 10 Buangkok View, Singapore, 539747, Singapore.
Lum Joon KitClinical Research Unit, National Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.
Lee Eng SingClinical Research Unit, National Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.
Swapna VermaDepartment of Psychosis, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Wei Ker-ChiahWest Region, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Pamela NgEast Region, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Mythily SubramaniamResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Buangkok Green Medical Park, 10 Buangkok View, Singapore, 539747, Singapore.

Funding

Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council MOH-HSRG-MH17Nov-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to identify disability classes among people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, depression, anxiety or diabetes via the WHODAS 2.0; investigate the invariance of disability patterns among the four diagnostic groups; and examine associations between disability classes and sociodemographic variables.

methodsPatients seeking treatment for schizophrenia spectrum disorder, depression, anxiety or diabetes (n=1076) were recruited. Latent class analysis was used to identify disability classes based on WHODAS 2.0 responses. Measurement invariance was tested using multi-group latent class analysis. Associations between classes and sociodemographic variables were tested via multinomial logistic regression.

resultsA five-class solution was identified; examination of model invariance showed that the partially constrained five-class model was most appropriate, suggesting that class structure was consistent while class membership differed across diagnostic groups. Finally, significant associations were found between class membership and ethnicity, education level, and employment status.

conclusionsThe results show the feasibility of using the WHODAS 2.0 to identify and compare different disability classes among people with mental or physical conditions and their sociodemographic correlates. Establishing a typology of different disability profiles will help guide research and treatment plans that tackle not just clinical but also functional aspects of living with either a chronic psychiatric or physical condition.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationLatent Class AnalysisPersons with DisabilitiesWorld Health OrganizationAdultDepressionDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedSchizophreniaSurveys and QuestionnairesAssessmentChronic conditionsDisabilityMental illnessPsychiatryWHODAS

Identifiers

PMID39061074
PMCPMC11282711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.