Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060940›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2024

A multi-Task Learning based applicable AI model simultaneously predicts stage, histology, grade and LNM for cervical cancer before surgery.

Zhixiang Wang, Huiqiao Gao, Xinghao Wang, Marcin Grzegorzek, Jinfeng Li, Hengzi Sun, Yidi Ma, Xuefang Zhang, Zhen Zhang, Andre Dekker and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Deep dive into deep learning methods for cervical cancer detection and classification.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Zhixiang WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Huiqiao GaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xinghao WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marcin GrzegorzekInstitute for Medical Informatics, University of Luebeck, 23562, Luebeck, Germany.
Jinfeng LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hengzi SunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yidi MaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xuefang ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhen ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Andre DekkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alberto TraversoDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Zhenyu ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Linxue QianDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Meizhu Xiao *Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. meizhubailu164@126.com.
Ying Feng *Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 15116988424@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo build an Mult-Task Learning (MTL) based Artificial Intelligence(AI) model that can simultaneously predict clinical stage, histology, grade and LNM for cervical cancer before surgery.

methodsThis retrospective and prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2001 to March 2014 for the training set and from January 2018 to November 2021 for the validation set at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University. Preoperative clinical information of cervical cancer patients was used. An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm was used to build the MTL-based AI model. Accuracy and weighted F1 scores were calculated as evaluation indicators. The performance of the MTL model was compared with Single-Task Learning (STL) models. Additionally, a Turing test was performed by 20 gynecologists and compared with this AI model.

resultsA total of 223 cervical cancer cases were retrospectively enrolled into the training set, and 58 cases were prospectively collected as independent validation set. The accuracy of this cervical cancer AI model constructed with ANN algorithm in predicting stage, histology, grade and LNM were 75%, 95%, 86% and 76%, respectively. And the corresponding weighted F1 score were 70%, 94%, 86%, and 76%, respectively. The average time consumption of AI simultaneously predicting stage, histology, grade and LNM for cervical cancer was 0.01s (95%CI: 0.01-0.01) per 20 patients. The mean time consumption doctor and doctor with AI were 581.1s (95%CI: 300.0-900.0) per 20 patients and 534.8s (95%CI: 255.0-720.0) per 20 patients, respectively. Except for LNM, both the accuracy and F-score of the AI model were significantly better than STL AI, doctors and AI-assisted doctors in predicting stage, grade and histology. (P < 0.05) The time consumption of AI was significantly less than that of doctors' prediction and AI-assisted doctors' results. (P < 0.05

conclusionA multi-task learning AI model can simultaneously predict stage, histology, grade, and LNM for cervical cancer preoperatively with minimal time consumption. To improve the conditions and use of the beneficiaries, the model should be integrated into routine clinical workflows, offering a decision-support tool for gynecologists. Future studies should focus on refining the model for broader clinical applications, increasing the diversity of the training datasets, and enhancing its adaptability to various clinical settings. Additionally, continuous feedback from clinical practice should be incorporated to ensure the model's accuracy and reliability, ultimately improving personalized patient care and treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedAlgorithmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingNeural Networks, ComputerProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAIANNCervical cancerDiagnosisMulti-task learningPredictionPreoperativeProspective

Identifiers

PMID39060940
PMCPMC11282769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.