ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024
Rehabilitation for spinal muscular atrophy patients in China: a national cross-sectional study.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rehabilitation approaches used for children with spinal muscular atrophy: A scoping review based on the F-words framework.Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Rehabilitation management for patients with spinal muscular atrophy: a review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Review
- [Clinical analysis of nusinersen for spinal muscular atrophy types 2 and 3 in children].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatricsArticle
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe management of Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach, wherein rehabilitation constitutes an integral element. In this study, we examined the effects of rehabilitation among Chinese SMA patients and assessed the real-world efficacy of rehabilitation interventions.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional online survey on SMA patients from June 9, 2023, to June 30, 2023, through the Meier Advocacy & Support Center using data from the Center's database and electronic questionnaires. The rehabilitation situation of the participants over the past 14 months were investigated. Logistic binary regression was used to analyze the relationship between Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory(PedsQL™) scores and rehabilitation.
resultA total of 186 questionnaires were finally analyzed. Only 29 patients did not rehabilitated in the past 14 months. A significant correlation between age and type of rehabilitation, as well as between age and duration of rehabilitation. Patients receiving no rehabilitation or solely home-based rehabilitation exhibited a higher median age of 8.4 compared to those undergoing standard rehabilitation or a combination of standard and home-based rehabilitation, with a median age of 4.9 (z-score = -4.49, p-value < 0.001). In addition, long-term rehabilitation (OR = 0.314, 95%CI = 0.106-0.927, p = 0.04) were negatively correlated with lower PedsQL™ Neuromuscular Module scores, and PedsQL scores in the long-term rehabilitation group were higher than those in the short-term and no-rehabilitation groups (54.2 ± 15.1 vs. 45.9 ± 14.4 and 42.3 ± 14.3, p = 0.01), with the most significant difference observed in the physical function section (59.0 ± 15.8 vs. 46.8 ± 15.2 and 45.6 ± 15.9, p < 0.01). Mobility and exercise (OR = 0.26, 95%CI = 0.08-0.81, p = 0.02), as well as assistive technology (OR = 0.28, 95%CI = 0.10-0.82, p = 0.02), were independently associated with a lower score in a negative direction.
conclusionThe study found that long-term rehabilitation was linked to higher PedsQL scores in SMA patients, highlighting the need for standardized rehabilitation programs to enhance function and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.