ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Augmented reality for endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery: evaluating design factors with neurosurgeons.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- First-in-human evaluation of real-time pixel-level AI-assisted anatomical segmentation in neurosurgery: pituitary surgery as an exemplar.Pituitary · 2026Article
- Apple Vision Pro-Enabled Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Pituitary Adenoma Resection: First In-Human Spatial Computing Skull Base Neurosurgery Case Report.Journal of neurological surgery reports · 2026Article
- The Role of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Transsphenoidal Surgical Approaches to the Sellar and Parasellar Area-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study investigates the potential utility of augmented reality (AR) in the endoscopic transsphenoidal approach (TSA). While previous research has addressed technical challenges in AR for TSA, this paper explores how design factors can improve AR for neurosurgeons from a human-centred design perspective.
methodsPreliminary qualitative research involved observations of TSA procedures (
resultsAR visualisations may be beneficial in streamlining the sellar phase and reducing intraoperative errors such as excessive or inadequate exposure. Key design recommendations include a lean mesh rendering, an intuitive colour palette, and optional structure highlighting.
conclusionThis research presents user-centred design guidelines to improve sensemaking and surgical workflow in the sellar phase of TSA, with the goal of improving clinical outcomes. The specific improvements that AR could bring to the workflow are discussed along with surgeons' reservations and its possible application towards training less experienced physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.