SynthesisLa Radiologia medica2024
Radiomics as a tool for prognostic prediction in transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in La Radiologia medica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Radiomics for differentiating radiation-induced brain injury from recurrence in gliomas: systematic review, meta-analysis, and methodological quality evaluation using METRICS and RQS.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Predictive performance of MRI and CT radiomics in predicting the response to induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Methodological Considerations for Sector-Based MRI Radiomics in Predicting Post-TACE Recurrence Location in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Human-AI Interaction in Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Methodological quality of cardiac CT and MRI radiomics studies assessed using METRICS and RQS by human readers and ChatGPT 5.1 Thinking.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Arterial and biliary complications after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Prediction of the efficacy after the first transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma using CT radiomics combined with inflammatory composite indicators.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Analysis of risk factors and prediction of prognosis in patients with primary liver cancer undergoing transarterial chemoembolization.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Interventional Radiology.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Explanation and Elaboration with Examples for METRICS (METRICS-E3): an initiative from the EuSoMII Radiomics Auditing Group.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Combination of radiomic and clinical characteristics to predict mortality in patients with colorectal perforation.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- The Role of Nuclear Medicine in Predicting Treatment Response to Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Review
- A Clinical-Radiomics Nomogram Predicts Early Tumor Necrosis After Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is one of the predominant locoregional therapeutic modalities for addressing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, achieving precise prognostic predictions and effective patient selection remains a challenging pursuit. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of radiomics in forecasting the prognosis associated with TACE treatment.
methodsA comprehensive exploration of pertinent original studies was undertaken, encompassing databases of PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. The studies' quality was meticulously evaluated employing the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2), the radiomics quality score (RQS) and the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS). Pooled statistics, along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), were computed for sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). Additionally, a summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC) was generated. To discern potential sources of heterogeneity, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed.
resultsThe systematic review incorporated 29 studies, comprising a total of 5483 patients, with 14 studies involving 2691 patients qualifying for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The assessed studies exhibited commendable quality with regard to bias risk, with mean RQS of 12.90 ± 5.13 (35.82% ± 14.25%) and mean METRICS of 62.98% ± 14.58%. The pooled sensitivity was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87), specificity was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.92), PLR was 6.13 (95% CI: 3.79-9.90), and NLR was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.15-0.27). The area under the sROC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.93). Significant heterogeneity within all the included studies was observed, while meta-regression and subgroup analyses revealed homogeneous and promising findings in subgroups where principal methodological variables such as modeling algorithms, imaging modalities, and imaging phases were specified.
conclusionRadiomics models have exhibited robust predictive capabilities concerning prognosis subsequent to TACE, thereby presenting promising prospects for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.