ArticleBehavior research methods2024
An exploratory Q-matrix estimation method based on sparse non-negative matrix factorization.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A general diagnostic modelling framework for forced-choice assessments.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive diagnostic assessment (CDA) is widely used because it can provide refined diagnostic information. The Q-matrix is the basis of CDA, and can be specified by domain experts or by data-driven estimation methods based on observed response data. The data-driven Q-matrix estimation methods have become a research hotspot because of their objectivity, accuracy, and low calibration cost. However, most of the existing data-driven methods require known prior knowledge, such as initial Q-matrix, partial q-vector, or the number of attributes. Under the G-DINA model, we propose to estimate the number of attributes and Q-matrix elements simultaneously without any prior knowledge by the sparse non-negative matrix factorization (SNMF) method, which has the advantage of high scalability and universality. Simulation studies are carried out to investigate the performance of the SNMF. The results under a wide variety of simulation conditions indicate that the SNMF has good performance in the accuracy of attribute number and Q-matrix elements estimation. In addition, a set of real data is taken as an example to illustrate its application. Finally, we discuss the limitations of the current study and directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39060862What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.