Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060823›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience bulletin2025

Neural Basis of Categorical Representations of Animal Body Silhouettes.

Yue Pu, Shihui Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yue PuSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, PKU-IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100081, China.
Shihui HanSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, PKU-IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100081, China. shan@pku.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural activities differentiating bodies versus non-body stimuli have been identified in the occipitotemporal cortex of both humans and nonhuman primates. However, the neural mechanisms of coding the similarity of different individuals' bodies of the same species to support their categorical representations remain unclear. Using electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), we investigated the temporal and spatial characteristics of neural processes shared by different individual body silhouettes of the same species by quantifying the repetition suppression of neural responses to human and animal (chimpanzee, dog, and bird) body silhouettes showing different postures. Our EEG results revealed significant repetition suppression of the amplitudes of early frontal/central activity at 180-220 ms (P2) and late occipitoparietal activity at 220-320 ms (P270) in response to animal (but not human) body silhouettes of the same species. Our MEG results further localized the repetition suppression effect related to animal body silhouettes in the left supramarginal gyrus and left frontal cortex at 200-440 ms after stimulus onset. Our findings suggest two neural processes that are involved in spontaneous categorical representations of animal body silhouettes as a cognitive basis of human-animal interactions.

Indexed as

BrainPattern Recognition, VisualAdultAnimalsBrain MappingDogsElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultBody silhouetteCategorizationEEGMEGRepression suppression

Identifiers

PMID39060823
PMCPMC11794784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.