ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
The efficacy of robot-assisted surgery on minor basal ganglia cerebral hemorrhage with neurological dysfunction.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stereotactic Drainage Treatment is Associated with Improved Long-Term Neurological Recovery in Small-to-Moderate Volume Basal Ganglia Hemorrhages: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurocritical care · 2026Pooled it
- A novel rapid surface projection localization technique (RSPLT) using 3D slicer and smartphone-assisted registration for keyhole evacuation of intracerebral hematomas.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Robot assisted stereotactic surgery improves hematoma evacuation in intracerebral hemorrhage compared to frame based method.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comparison between robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery and conventional craniotomy for intracerebral hemorrhage: efficiency, complications and outcomes.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to compare the outcomes of robot-assisted drainage and conservative treatment in minor basal ganglia hemorrhage (10ml< hemorrhage volume ≤ 30 ml) patients with neurological dysfunction, and analyze patients treated with robot-assisted drainage in order to optimize this treatment strategy.
methodsIn a retrospective study conducted in December 2021 to December 2023, minor basal ganglia cerebral hemorrhage patients with neurological dysfunction were enrolled from the Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital. The patients included both the surgical (robot-assisted drainage) and conservative groups. The efficacy of robot-assisted drainage compared with conservative treatment in patients with minor cerebral hemorrhage and neurological dysfunction was evaluated by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score after 3 months, muscle strength (grade 1 to 5) and cost of hospitalization.
resultsOf the patients included, 23 received robot-assisted drainage and 20 received conservative treatment. There were no significant differences in gender, age, history of hypertension and diabetes, muscle strength and mRS score at admission. Female patients accounted for 32.6%, and male patients accounted for 67.4%. About 90% of the patients enrolled had a pre-existing hypertension history. The mRS score after 3 months indicated that prognosis of the patients was significantly better in the surgical treatment group than the conservative treatment group (favorable prognosis 69.57% VS. 35%, P = 0.034) while the patients underwent surgery paid higher hospital bills than patients treated conservatively.
conclusionCompared with traditional conservative treatment, robot-assisted drainage surgery is more helpful to improve the prognosis of patients with minor basal ganglia hemorrhage (volume ≤ 30mL) accompanied by neurological dysfunction. Robot assisted surgery can safely and effectively remove the hematoma of minor basal ganglia hemorrhage, and there were 69.6% of surgery group patients had a good prognosis in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39060801What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.