Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060746›Full record

SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2024

Responsive neurostimulation in pediatric epilepsy: a systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis supplemented by a single institution case series in 105 aggregated patients.

A Rosenberg, R Wang, M Petchpradub, C Beaudreault, A Sacknovitz, F M Cozzi, S M Wolf, P E McGoldrick, C R Muh

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A guide to neuromodulation in drug-resistant epilepsy.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Responsive neurostimulation in children, adolescents, and young Adults-Longitudinal effectiveness and safety.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A Rosenberg *School of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA. arosenbe14@student.nymc.edu.
R Wang *School of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
M PetchpradubSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
C BeaudreaultSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
A SacknovitzSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
F M CozziCambridge Brain Tumour Imaging Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
S M WolfSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
P E McGoldrickSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
C R MuhSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess responsive neurostimulation (RNS) efficacy in pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, comparing response (≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency) rates between patients with two or fewer seizure foci and those with multifocal or generalized epilepsy. This study seeks to address the gap in knowledge regarding RNS effectiveness in pediatric populations.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis included data from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science through November 2023, including 17 retrospective studies and a case series of 24 patients from our practice for a total of 105 aggregated patients. The inclusion criteria of patients were age

resultsSeventeen retrospective studies and a single-institution case series, encompassing 105 pediatric patients, were analyzed. Effect sizes and confidence intervals were calculated to quantify treatment effects. Analyses revealed that RNS reduces seizure frequency across a spectrum of pediatric epilepsy syndromes, irrespective of the seizures' focal, multifocal, or generalized origins. The effectiveness of RNS was not influenced by the patient's sex, age at epilepsy onset, or presence of neurological and psychiatric comorbidities. Prior vagus nerve stimulation surgery and the presence of an epileptic syndrome were factors associated with a lower likelihood of near-complete seizure remission with RNS, underscoring the complexities of treating patients with generalized epilepsies or previous interventional failures. The necessity of further research into individualized surgical strategies for patients was underscored by the mixed results of comparisons of electrode characteristics with responder rates. Limitations of our study include its reliance on retrospective studies, which introduces potential bias and limits the ability to infer causality. DISCUSSION: RNS is a safe and effective treatment in pediatric patients with DRE across demographic, comorbidity, and focality variability. FDA age and focality restrictions, along with patient and physician hesitancy, may be limiting the potential for effective treatment of pediatric DRE with RNS. Prospective randomized trials are recommended to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolElectric Stimulation TherapyFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeDrug-resistant epilepsyEpilepsy surgeryPediatricsResponsive neurostimulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.