ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2024
Probiotics to Prevent Celiac Disease and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bifidobacterium longum Ameliorates Intestinal Inflammation and Metabolic Biomarkers in Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet with Gliadin by Indoleacrylic Acid.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Article
- How Do Socio-Demographic Factors, Health Status, and Knowledge Influence the Acceptability of Probiotics Products in Hong Kong?Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of chronic inflammatory diseases (CIDs) is dramatically increasing in the developed world, resulting in an increased burden of disease in childhood. Currently, there are limited effective strategies for treating or preventing these conditions. To date, myriads of cross-sectional studies have described alterations in the composition of the gut microbiota in a variety of disease states, after the disease has already occurred. We suggest that to mechanically link these microbiome changes with disease pathogenesis, a prospective cohort design is needed to capture changes that precede or coincide with disease onset and symptoms. In addition, these prospective studies must integrate microbiological, metagenomic, meta transcriptomic and metabolomic data with minimal and standardized clinical and environmental metadata that allow to correctly compare and interpret the results of the analysis of the human microbiota in order to build a system-level model of the interactions between the host and the development of the disease. The creation of new biological computational models thus constructed will allow us to finally move from the detection of simple elements of "association" to the identification of elements of real "causality" allowing to provide a mechanistic approach to the exploration of the development of CIDs.This can only be done when these diseases are studied as complex biological networks. In this chapter we discuss the current knowledge regarding the contribution of the microbiome to CID in childhood, focusing on celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease, with the overall aim of identifying pathways to shift research from descriptive to mechanistic approaches. We then examine how some components of the microbiota, through epigenetic reprogramming, can start the march from genetic predisposition to clinical expression of CIDs, thus opening up new possibilities for intervention, through microbiota therapy targeting the manipulation of the composition and function of the microbiota, for future applications of precision medicine and primary prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39060733What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.