ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2024
Observational Clinical Investigation Evaluating an Ophthalmic Solution Containing Xanthan Gum and Low Concentration Desonide Phosphate in Dry Eye Disease Treatment.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunomodulation of the Ocular Surface in Severe Dry Eye Disease: Expert-Driven Literature Review on Treatment Strategies with Description of Representative Challenging Cases.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- New Eye Drop Formulation Based on Desonide and Xanthan Gum in Dry Eye Disease: Nonclinical Studies.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with dry eye disease (DED) complain of a multitude of symptoms that affect their visual function and quality of life (QoL). This clinical investigation assessed the performance, tolerance, and safety of a novel preservative-free ophthalmic solution containing xanthan gum 0.2% and desonide sodium phosphate 0.025%.
methodsThis was an observational, prospective, multicentric, and post-market clinical investigation to assess the effect of three times a day instillation of the study formulation in patients suffering from DED. The primary objective was to achieve a 50% reduction in conjunctival hyperemia index as assessed with the OCULUS Keratograph after 1 month of treatment compared to baseline values. The secondary objectives included patient-reported outcomes, clinical performance, and safety.
resultsThirty patients were enrolled (21 women, 9 men) with a mean age of 61.10 ± 14.53 years. The instillation of the study formulation was associated with a significant reduction in redness scores after 1 month of treatment compared to baseline (mean - 0.51 ± 0.51; p ≤ 0.0001). Although the primary endpoint was not completely met, a 50% reduction in the conjunctival hyperemia index was achieved in 23% of the participants, and 77% showed a reduction of 26% of the same index. In addition, the ophthalmic solution significantly increased tear film break-up time, and a significant reduction of corneal and conjunctival staining with fluorescein was achieved. It also reduced DED symptoms and had a very good safety profile.
conclusionsthe study formulation produced a significant improvement in the signs, symptoms, and QoL of patients with mild to moderate DED with a good safety profile after 1 month of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.