Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060665›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2024

MRI contrast agents and retention in the brain: review of contemporary knowledge and recommendations to the future.

Josef Vymazal, Aaron M Rulseh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Manganese-Templated Nontrivial Structures for MRI and Therapy.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cerebral Accumulation of Gadolinium (GdTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Mechanical Forces Guide Axon Growth through the Nigrostriatal Pathway in an Organotypic Model.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Josef VymazalDepartment of Radiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Roentgenova 2, Prague, 150 30, Czech Republic.
Aaron M RulsehDepartment of Radiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Roentgenova 2, Prague, 150 30, Czech Republic. aarulseh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8332-4419

Funding

Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky NV18-04-00457Nemocnice Na Homolce MH CZ - DRO (NHH, 00023884)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) were introduced with high expectations for favorable efficacy, low nephrotoxicity, and minimal allergic-like reactions. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and proven gadolinium retention in the body including the brain has led to the restriction of linear GBCAs and a more prudent approach regarding GBCA indication and dosing. In this review, we present the chemical, physical, and clinical aspects of this topic and aim to provide an equanimous and comprehensive summary of contemporary knowledge with a perspective of the future. In the first part of the review, we present various elements and compounds that may serve as MRI contrast agents. Several GBCAs are further discussed with consideration of their relaxivity, chelate structure, and stability. Gadolinium retention in the brain is explored including correlation with the presence of metalloprotein ferritin in the same regions where visible hyperintensity on unenhanced T1-weighted imaging occurs. Proven interaction between ferritin and gadolinium released from GBCAs is introduced and discussed, as well as the interaction of other elements with ferritin; and manganese in patients with impaired liver function or calcium in Fahr disease. We further present the concept that only high-molecular-weight forms of gadolinium can likely visibly change signal intensity on unenhanced T1-weighted imaging. Clinical data are also presented with respect to potential neurological manifestations originating from the deep-brain nuclei. Finally, new contrast agents with relatively high relaxivity and stability are introduced. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: GBCA may accumulate in the brain, especially in ferritin-rich areas; however, no adverse neurological manifestations have been detected in relation to gadolinium retention. KEY POINTS: Gadolinium currently serves as the basis for MRI contrast agents used clinically. No adverse neurological manifestations have been detected in relation to gadolinium retention. Future contrast agents must advance chelate stability and relativity, facilitating lower doses.

Indexed as

FerritinGadoliniumGadolinium retentionMRI contrast agentsRelaxivity

Identifiers

PMID39060665
PMCPMC11282029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.