Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060612›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2024

Investigating the relationship between physical cognitive tasks and a social cognitive task in a wild bird.

Grace Blackburn, Benjamin J Ashton, Alex Thornton, Holly Hunter, Sarah Woodiss-Field, Amanda R Ridley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Demonstrating the reproductive consequences of cognition: learning from experience.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Response to intruder number is related to spontaneous quantity discrimination performance in a wild bird.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Grace BlackburnCentre of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia. grace.blackburn@research.uwa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0090-6649
Benjamin J AshtonCentre of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3357-0395
Alex ThorntonCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1607-2047
Holly HunterCentre of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Sarah Woodiss-FieldCentre of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Amanda R RidleyCentre of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5886-0992

Funding

ARC Discovery Grant DP200100566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite considerable research into the structure of cognition in non-human animal species, there is still much debate as to whether animal cognition is organised as a series of discrete domains or an overarching general cognitive factor. In humans, the existence of general intelligence is widely accepted, but less work has been undertaken in animal psychometrics to address this question. The relatively few studies on non-primate animal species that do investigate the structure of cognition rarely include tasks assessing social cognition and focus instead on physical cognitive tasks. In this study, we tested 36 wild Western Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen dorsalis) on a battery of three physical (associative learning, spatial memory, and numerical assessment) and one social (observational spatial memory) cognitive task, to investigate if cognition in this species fits a general cognitive factor model, or instead one of separate physical and social cognitive domains. A principal component analysis (PCA) identified two principal components with eigenvalues exceeding 1; a first component onto which all three physical tasks loaded strongly and positively, and a second component onto which only the social task (observational spatial memory) loaded strongly and positively. These findings provide tentative evidence for separate physical and social cognitive domains in this species, and highlight the importance of including tasks assessing both social and physical cognition in cognitive test batteries.

Indexed as

CognitionPasseriformesAnimalsFemaleMaleSocial CognitionSpatial MemoryCognitionGeneral intelligenceMagpiesSocial cognitionWildlife

Identifiers

PMID39060612
PMCPMC11281958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.