Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060561›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The effect of including dynamic imaging derived airway wall motion in CFD simulations of respiratory airflow in patients with OSA.

Qiwei Xiao, Chamindu Gunatilaka, Keith McConnell, Alister Bates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patient-Specific Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Airway Collapse in Infants With Robin Sequence.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qiwei XiaoDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, MLC2021, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Chamindu GunatilakaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, MLC2021, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Keith McConnellDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, MLC2021, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Alister BatesDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, MLC2021, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. alister.bates@cchmc.org.

Funding

Improving Outcomes in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Computational Fluid DynamicsR00HL144822 · NHLBI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI BATES, ALISTER · 2022 to 2024
$747k
NHLBI NIH HHS R00HL144822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an airway disease caused by periodic collapse of the airway during sleep. Imaging-based subject-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations allow non-invasive assessment of clinically relevant metrics such as total pressure loss (TPL) in patients with OSA. However, most of such studies use static airway geometries, which neglect physiological airway motion. This study aims to quantify how much the airway moves during the respiratory cycle, and to determine how much this motion affects CFD pressure loss predictions. Motion of the airway wall was quantified using cine MRI data captured over a single respiratory cycle in three subjects with OSA. Synchronously-measured respiratory airflow was used as the flow boundary condition for all simulations. Simulations were performed for full respiratory cycles with 5 different wall boundary conditions: (1) a moving airway wall, and static airway walls at (2) peak inhalation, (3) end inhalation, (4) peak exhalation, and (5) end exhalation. Geometric analysis exposed significant local airway cross-sectional area (CSA) variability, with local CSA varying as much as 300%. The comparative CFD simulations revealed the discrepancies between dynamic and static wall simulations are subject-specific, with TPL differing by up to 400% between static and dynamic simulations. There is no consistent pattern to which static wall CFD simulations overestimate or underestimate the airway TPL. This variability underscores the complexity of accurately modeling airway physiology and the importance of considering dynamic anatomical factors to predict realistic respiratory airflow dynamics in patients with OSA.

Indexed as

HydrodynamicsSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdultComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary VentilationRespirationComputational fluid dynamicsMagnet resonance imagingObstructive sleep apneaPatient-specificRespiratory airflowUpper airway

Identifiers

PMID39060561
PMCPMC11282179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.