Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060536›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2024

Multiple craniotomies in patients with brain metastases: a two-center, propensity score-matched study.

Luis Padevit, Anna Maria Zeitlberger, Nicolai Maldaner, Johannes Sarnthein, Oliver Bozinov, Luca Regli, Marian Christoph Neidert, Carlo Serra, Stefanos Voglis

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luis PadevitDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2461-0404
Anna Maria ZeitlbergerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9837-5534
Nicolai MaldanerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0284-1033
Johannes SarntheinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9141-381X
Oliver BozinovDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4620-3992
Luca RegliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4639-4474
Marian Christoph NeidertDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2828-4706
Carlo SerraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7305-550X
Stefanos VoglisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland. stefanos.voglis@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1514-1442

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study addresses the question of whether the resection of more than one BM by multiple craniotomies within the same operation is associated with more adverse events (AEs) and worse functional outcome compared to cases in which only one BM was resected. All patients who underwent more than one craniotomy for resection of multiple BM at two Swiss tertiary neurosurgical care centers were included. Any AEs, functional outcome, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed after 1:1 propensity score matching with patients who underwent removal of a single BM only. A total of 94 patients were included in the final study cohort (47 of whom underwent multiple craniotomies). There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the single and the multiple craniotomy group (n = 2 (4.3%) vs. n = 4 (8.5%), p = .7). Change in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at discharge demonstrated that slightly more single craniotomy patients improved in mRS, while the proportion of patients who worsened in mRS (16.3 vs. 16.7%) and KPS (13.6 vs. 15.2%) was similar in both groups (p = .42 for mRS and p = .92 for KPS). Survival analysis showed no significant differences in OS between patients with single and multiple craniotomies (p = .18). Resection of multiple BM with more than one craniotomy may be considered a safe option without increased AEs or worse functional outcome.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCraniotomyPropensity ScoreAdultAgedFemaleHumansKarnofsky Performance StatusMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdverse eventsBrain metastasesComplicationsImmunotherapySurgical resectionTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID39060536
PMCPMC11281945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.