Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060508›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Unraveling pain experience and catastrophizing after cognitive behavioral therapy.

Satoshi Yokoyama, Tomonori Adachi, Atsuo Yoshino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Satoshi YokoyamaFaculty of Humanities, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan. syoko@human.niigata-u.ac.jp.
Tomonori AdachiGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Atsuo YoshinoDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22K18647Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23H01040Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23H01048Moonshot Research and Development Program JPMJM S2296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain experiences are often complex with catastrophic cognitions, emotions, and behaviors. Cognitive behavioral therapists share the work of unraveling these complex experiences with their patients. However, the change process underlying the unraveling of the pain experience have not yet been quantified. We used an interrelationship-focused network model to examine the way an undifferentiated conceptualization between cognition and pain experience changed via group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). Overall, 65 participants (77.4% of all patients who entered the intervention) were included in the analysis; they attended the total of 12 weekly group CBT and filled the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire and the pain catastrophizing questionnaire. Before treatment, there were no edges in the partial correlation-based network because of large covariation across items. After treatment, many edges appeared and, particularly strong couplings were found between items within the same subscale. The formative shift from a non-edged pre-treatment network to a mature post-treatment network may indicate that patients were able to conceptualize these symbolic constructs better. These results are probably of interest to clinicians and would be consistent with the fundamental monitoring process of CBT.

Indexed as

CatastrophizationCognitive Behavioral TherapyAdultAgedCognitionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPain ManagementPain MeasurementSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39060508
PMCPMC11282057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.