SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024
Patient outcomes after implementation of transitional care protocols in elective neurosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objective30-day readmissions are a significant burden on the healthcare system. Postoperative transitional care protocols (TCPs) for safe and efficient discharge planning are being more widely adopted to reduce readmission rates. Currently, little evidence exists to justify the utility of TCPs for improving patient outcomes in elective neurosurgery. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the extent to which TCPs reduce adverse outcomes in patients undergoing elective neurosurgical procedures. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted after PROSPERO registration. Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane review databases were searched through February 1, 2024. Keywords included: "transitional care AND neurosurgery", "Discharge planning AND neurosurgery". Articles were included if they assessed postoperative TCPs in an adult population undergoing elective neurosurgeries. Exclusion criteria were pediatric patients, implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, or non-elective neurosurgical procedures. The primary outcome was readmission rates after implementation of TCPs.
results16 articles were included in this review. 2 articles found that patients treated with TCPs had significantly higher chances of home discharge. 7 articles found a significant association between implementation of TCP and reduced length of stay and intensive care unit stay. 3 articles reported an increase in patient satisfaction after implementation of TCPs. 3 found that TCP led to a significant decrease in readmissions. After meta-analysis, TCPs were associated with significantly decreased readmission rates (OR: 0.68, p < 0.0001), length of stay (mean difference: -0.57, p < 0.00001), and emergency department visits (OR: 0.33, p < 0.0001).
conclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis found that an overwhelming majority of the available literature supports the effectiveness of discharge planning on at least one measure of patient outcomes. However, the extent to which each facet of the TCP affects outcomes in elective neurosurgery remains unclear. Future efforts should be made to compare the effectiveness of different TCPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39060496What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.