ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Deep learning-based automatic ASPECTS calculation can improve diagnosis efficiency in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter study.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep-learning-based non-contrast CT for detecting acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and HSROC meta-analysis of patient-level diagnostic accuracy.BMC neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical evaluation of an automated Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS)-scoring system.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Real-world effectiveness of thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion: lessons beyond the ATTENTION and BAOCHE trials.European stroke journal · 2026Article
- A Decade of Artificial Intelligence in Stroke Care (2015-2025): Trends, Clinical Translation, and the Precision Medicine Frontier-A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Redefining Stroke Care with Artificial Intelligence: Recent Advances.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- Initial diagnosis and management of acute ischemic stroke: updates and future directions.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Current State of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Stroke: A Literature Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Evaluation of ChatGPT-5 for Automated ASPECTS Assessment on Non-Contrast CT in Acute Ischemic Stroke.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Analysis of factors influencing short-term outcomes after early interventional therapy for acute ischaemic stroke.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Prediction of prognosis in acute ischemic stroke after mechanical thrombectomy based on multimodal MRI radiomics and deep learning.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scoping Review.Neurointervention · 2024Review
- Target-based deep learning network surveillance of non-contrast computed tomography for small infarct core of acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), a systematic method for assessing ischemic changes in acute ischemic stroke using non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT), is often interpreted relying on expert experience and can vary between readers. This study aimed to develop a clinically applicable automatic ASPECTS system employing deep learning (DL).
methodsThis study enrolled 1987 NCCT scans that were retrospectively collected from four centers between January 2017 and October 2021. A DL-based system for automated ASPECTS assessment was trained on a development cohort (N = 1767) and validated on an independent test cohort (N = 220). The consensus of experienced physicians was regarded as a reference standard. The validity and reliability of the proposed system were assessed against physicians' readings. A real-world prospective application study with 13,399 patients was used for system validation in clinical contexts.
resultsThe DL-based system achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 84.97% and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.84 for overall-level analysis on the test cohort. The system's diagnostic sensitivity was 94.61% for patients with dichotomized ASPECTS at a threshold of ≥ 6, with substantial agreement (ICC = 0.65) with expert ratings. Combining the system with physicians improved AUC from 67.43 to 89.76%, reducing diagnosis time from 130.6 ± 66.3 s to 33.3 ± 8.3 s (p < 0.001). During the application in clinical contexts, 94.0% (12,591) of scans successfully processed by the system were utilized by clinicians, and 96% of physicians acknowledged significant improvement in work efficiency.
conclusionThe proposed DL-based system could accurately and rapidly determine ASPECTS, which might facilitate clinical workflow for early intervention. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The deep learning-based automated ASPECTS evaluation system can accurately and rapidly determine ASPECTS for early intervention in clinical workflows, reducing processing time for physicians by 74.8%, but still requires validation by physicians when in clinical applications. KEY POINTS: The deep learning-based system for ASPECTS quantification has been shown to be non-inferior to expert-rated ASPECTS. This system improved the consistency of ASPECTS evaluation and reduced processing time to 33.3 seconds per scan. 94.0% of scans successfully processed by the system were utilized by clinicians during the prospective clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39060495What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.