Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060495›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Deep learning-based automatic ASPECTS calculation can improve diagnosis efficiency in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter study.

Jianyong Wei, Kai Shang, Xiaoer Wei, Yueqi Zhu, Yang Yuan, Mengfei Wang, Chengyu Ding, Lisong Dai, Zheng Sun, Xinsheng Mao and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Redefining Stroke Care with Artificial Intelligence: Recent Advances.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jianyong Wei *School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 200093, Shanghai, China.
Kai Shang *Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200233, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoer WeiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200233, Shanghai, China.
Yueqi ZhuInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200233, Shanghai, China.
Yang YuanShuKun (BeiJing) Technology Co., Ltd., Jinhui Bd, Qiyang Road, 100029, Beijing, China.
Mengfei WangSchool of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 200093, Shanghai, China.
Chengyu DingShuKun (BeiJing) Technology Co., Ltd., Jinhui Bd, Qiyang Road, 100029, Beijing, China.
Lisong DaiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200233, Shanghai, China.
Zheng SunInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200233, Shanghai, China.
Xinsheng MaoShuKun (BeiJing) Technology Co., Ltd., Jinhui Bd, Qiyang Road, 100029, Beijing, China.
Fan YuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100053, Beijing, China.
Chunhong HuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 215006, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Duanduan ChenSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, 100190, Beijing, China.
Jie LuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100053, Beijing, China.
Yuehua LiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200233, Shanghai, China. liyuehua312@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8028-248X

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 8225024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), a systematic method for assessing ischemic changes in acute ischemic stroke using non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT), is often interpreted relying on expert experience and can vary between readers. This study aimed to develop a clinically applicable automatic ASPECTS system employing deep learning (DL).

methodsThis study enrolled 1987 NCCT scans that were retrospectively collected from four centers between January 2017 and October 2021. A DL-based system for automated ASPECTS assessment was trained on a development cohort (N = 1767) and validated on an independent test cohort (N = 220). The consensus of experienced physicians was regarded as a reference standard. The validity and reliability of the proposed system were assessed against physicians' readings. A real-world prospective application study with 13,399 patients was used for system validation in clinical contexts.

resultsThe DL-based system achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 84.97% and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.84 for overall-level analysis on the test cohort. The system's diagnostic sensitivity was 94.61% for patients with dichotomized ASPECTS at a threshold of ≥ 6, with substantial agreement (ICC = 0.65) with expert ratings. Combining the system with physicians improved AUC from 67.43 to 89.76%, reducing diagnosis time from 130.6 ± 66.3 s to 33.3 ± 8.3 s (p < 0.001). During the application in clinical contexts, 94.0% (12,591) of scans successfully processed by the system were utilized by clinicians, and 96% of physicians acknowledged significant improvement in work efficiency.

conclusionThe proposed DL-based system could accurately and rapidly determine ASPECTS, which might facilitate clinical workflow for early intervention. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The deep learning-based automated ASPECTS evaluation system can accurately and rapidly determine ASPECTS for early intervention in clinical workflows, reducing processing time for physicians by 74.8%, but still requires validation by physicians when in clinical applications. KEY POINTS: The deep learning-based system for ASPECTS quantification has been shown to be non-inferior to expert-rated ASPECTS. This system improved the consistency of ASPECTS evaluation and reduced processing time to 33.3 seconds per scan. 94.0% of scans successfully processed by the system were utilized by clinicians during the prospective clinical application.

Indexed as

Deep LearningIschemic StrokeRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAcute ischemic strokeArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkDiagnostic efficiencyNon-contrast computed tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.