ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Free-breathing 3D phase-resolved functional lung MRI vs breath-hold hyperpolarized
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using quantitative MRI biomarkers.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Phase-resolved functional lung magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of lung perfusion and ventilation in fibrosing interstitial lung diseases.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Comparison of Signal- and Volume-Based Ventilation-Weighted Assessment Using 3D FLORET UTE MRI in Patients With Various Pulmonary Disease.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Non-intubated uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical lung volume reduction surgery-an institutional report.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Clinical Evaluation of Lung Disorders: Current Status and Future Prospects.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Functional Pulmonary Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Dual-Center Repeatability, Consistency, and Comparison of 3D Phase-Resolved Functional (PREFUL) Ventilation MRI at 3 and 1.5 T in Healthy Volunteers.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Quantifying spatial and dynamic lung abnormalities with 3D PREFUL FLORET UTE imaging: A feasibility study.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- More accessible functional lung imaging: non-contrast CT-ventilation demonstrates strong association and agreement with PET-ventilation.Respiratory research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectives3D phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI offers evaluation of pulmonary ventilation without inhalation of contrast agent. This study seeks to compare ventilation maps obtained from 3D PREFUL MRI with a direct ventilation measurement derived from
methodsThirty-one patients with COPD and 12 healthy controls underwent free-breathing 3D PREFUL MRI and breath-hold
resultsOn a global level, all 3D PREFUL VDP values correlated significantly to VDP measure derived by
conclusionsFree-breathing 3D PREFUL MRI showed a strong correlation with breath-hold hyperpolarized CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: 3D PREFUL MRI correlated with KEY POINTS: Current non-invasive evaluation techniques for lung diseases have drawbacks;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.