SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024
Delayed traumatic intracranial aneurysms: literature review and case series.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Traumatic pseudoaneurysm of a distal middle cerebral artery branch with findings suggestive of an interdural location: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Article
- Post-traumatic internal carotid aneurysms caused by needlefish: lessons from one success story.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Unexplained Neurological Deterioration in Traumatic Brain Injury: Possible Cerebrospinal Fluid-Related Mechanisms.Chonnam medical journal · 2026Article
- Survival of a 2-month-old infant after clipping of ruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm: A case report and review of the literature.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Evolution of Diagnosis and Management of Traumatic Intracranial Aneurysms Secondary to Penetrating Brain Injury.Neurotrauma reportsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic intracranial aneurysm (TICA) is a rare and aggressive pathology that requires prompt treatment. Nevertheless, early vascular imaging following head trauma may yield falsely negative results, underscoring the importance of subsequent imaging within the first week to detect delayed TICAs. This study aims to report our experience with delayed TICAs and highlight the clinical importance of repeated angiographic screening for delayed TICAs. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated patients managed for a TICA at a tertiary care teaching institution over the last decade. Additionally, we conducted a systematic review of the literature, following the PRISMA guidelines, on previously reported TICAs, focusing on the time lag between the injury and diagnosis. Twelve delayed TICAs were diagnosed in 9 patients. The median time interval from injury to diagnosis was 2 days (IQR: 1-22 days), and from diagnosis to treatment was 2 days (IQR: 0-9 days). The average duration of radiological follow-up was 28 ± 38 months. At the final follow-up, four patients exhibited favorable neurological outcomes, while the remainder had adverse outcomes. The mortality rate was 22%. Literature reviews identified 112 patients with 114 TICAs, showcasing a median diagnostic delay post-injury of 15 days (IQR: 6-44 days), with 73% diagnosed beyond the first week post-injury. The median time until aneurysm rupture was 9 days (IQR: 3-24 days). Our findings demonstrate acceptable outcomes following TICA treatment and highlight the vital role of repeated vascular imaging after an initial negative computed tomography or digital subtraction angiography in excluding delayed TICAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39060452What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.