Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060443›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2024

Root canal widths of mandibular molars in predicting the legal age threshold 18 years in a sample of juveniles and sub-adults of south-indian origin: an orthopantomographic study.

Priyanka Vedula, Ashalata Gannepalli, Sudheer Babu Balla, Gayathri Ch, Anjum Bushra, Bhargavi Krishna Ayinampudi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Priyanka VedulaDepartment of Oral Pathology, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Ashalata GannepalliDepartment of Oral Pathology, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Sudheer Babu BallaLa Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia. s.balla@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0977-3889
Gayathri ChDepartment of Oral Pathology, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Anjum BushraDepartment of Oral Pathology, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Bhargavi Krishna AyinampudiDepartment of Oral Pathology, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pursuing a proficient age estimation methodology introducing novel radiographic methods remains an ongoing and demanding aspect of forensic and medicolegal research. In 2017, Roberts GJ et al. (J Forensic Sci 62(2):351-4, 2017) described a new radiographic method, i.e., root canal width (RCW) patterns to assign a subject to above 18-year-age threshold. Since then, few researchers have investigated the validity of this radiographic method in other populations. The present study aimed to test the usefulness of these RCW patterns in predicting 18 years in a sample of South Indian juveniles and sub-adults aged between 16 and 23. Descriptive analysis revealed that pattern-A was initially observed at a minimum age of 16.08 and 16.22 years in males and females. Pattern-B at 16.31 years in males and 16.22 years in females, while pattern-C was initially recorded at 18.73 years in males and 19.01 years in females, respectively. In summary, if an individual, regardless of sex, exhibits a fully-formed (apex closed) mandibular first, second, and third molars and concurrently displays RCW-C, there is a strong likelihood that the person has exceeded the legally relevant age of 18 years. However, due to higher rate of technically unacceptable errors (adults wrongly identified as individuals below 18 years), reliance on this method alone should be restricted, and it is advisable to combine it with other methods.

Indexed as

Age Determination by TeethDental Pulp CavityMandibleMolarRadiography, PanoramicAdolescentFemaleForensic DentistryHumansIndiaMaleYoung Adult18 yearsDental age assessmentMandibular molarsRoot canal widths

Identifiers

PMID39060443
PMCPMC11490458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.