ArticleScientific reports2024
Detection of diffusely abnormal white matter in multiple sclerosis on multiparametric brain MRI using semi-supervised deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regional IVIM-DWI Abnormalities in Normal-Appearing White Matter and Lesion Tissue in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning for refining interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging scans in the management of multiple sclerosis: a narrative review.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In addition to focal lesions, diffusely abnormal white matter (DAWM) is seen on brain MRI of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and may represent early or distinct disease processes. The role of MRI-observed DAWM is understudied due to a lack of automated assessment methods. Supervised deep learning (DL) methods are highly capable in this domain, but require large sets of labeled data. To overcome this challenge, a DL-based network (DAWM-Net) was trained using semi-supervised learning on a limited set of labeled data for segmentation of DAWM, focal lesions, and normal-appearing brain tissues on multiparametric MRI. DAWM-Net segmentation performance was compared to a previous intensity thresholding-based method on an independent test set from expert consensus (N = 25). Segmentation overlap by Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Spearman correlation of DAWM volumes were assessed. DAWM-Net showed DSC > 0.93 for normal-appearing brain tissues and DSC > 0.81 for focal lesions. For DAWM-Net, the DAWM DSC was 0.49 ± 0.12 with a moderate volume correlation (ρ = 0.52, p < 0.01). The previous method showed lower DAWM DSC of 0.26 ± 0.08 and lacked a significant volume correlation (ρ = 0.23, p = 0.27). These results demonstrate the feasibility of DL-based DAWM auto-segmentation with semi-supervised learning. This tool may facilitate future investigation of the role of DAWM in MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.