ArticlePediatric radiology2024
Doctor simulator: Delta-Age-Sex-AdaIn enhancing bone age assessment through AdaIn style transfer.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBone age assessment assists physicians in evaluating the growth and development of children. However, deep learning methods for bone age estimation do not currently incorporate differential features obtained through comparisons with other bone atlases.
objectiveTo propose a more accurate method, Delta-Age-Sex-AdaIn (DASA-net), for bone age assessment, this paper combines age and sex distribution through adaptive instance normalization (AdaIN) and style transfer, simulating the process of visually comparing hand images with a standard bone atlas to determine bone age. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe proposed Delta-Age-Sex-AdaIn (DASA-net) consists of four modules: BoneEncoder, Binary code distribution, Delta-Age-Sex-AdaIn, and AgeDecoder. It is compared with state-of-the-art methods on both a public Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) pediatric bone age prediction dataset (14,236 hand radiographs, ranging from 1 to 228 months) and a private bone age prediction dataset from Zigong Fourth People's Hospital (474 hand radiographs, ranging from 12 to 218 months, 268 male). Ablation experiments were designed to demonstrate the necessity of incorporating age distribution and sex distribution.
resultsThe DASA-net model achieved a lower mean absolute deviation (MAD) of 3.52 months on the RSNA dataset, outperforming other methods such as BoneXpert, Deeplasia, BoNet, and other deep learning based methods. On the private dataset, the DASA-net model obtained a MAD of 3.82 months, which is also superior to other methods.
conclusionThe proposed DASA-net model aided the model's learning of the distinctive characteristics of hand bones of various ages and both sexes by integrating age and sex distribution into style transfer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39060414What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.