ArticleScientific reports2024
Comprehensive analysis of clinical data and radiomic features from contrast enhanced CT for differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-center evaluation of radiomics and deep learning to stratify malignancy risk of IPMNs.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Radiomics and artificial intelligence in pancreatic cyst characterization: future or fiction?Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Gamma-glutamyl transferase as a redox-gatekeeper biomarker for pancreatic cystic neoplasms: A concise roadmap from epidemiology to bedside.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Pancreatic Cancer Detection in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (IPMN)-New Insights.Cancers · 2025Review
- Radiomics for preoperative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma risk stratification: Cross-population validation, multidimensional integration, challenges, and future directions.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Multi-center evaluation of radiomics and deep learning to stratify malignancy risk of IPMNs.Research square · 2025Article
- Postoperative Outcomes and Strategic Refinement in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Management: A Single Academic Cancer Center Experience.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The primary aim of this investigation was to leverage radiomics features derived from contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans to devise a predictive model to discern the benign and malignant nature of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). Radiomic signatures were meticulously crafted to delineate benign from malignant IPMNs by extracting pertinent features from contrast-enhanced CT images within a designated training cohort (n = 84). Subsequent validation was conducted with data from an independent test cohort (n = 37). The discriminative ability of the model was quantitatively evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, with the integration of carefully selected clinical features to improve the comparative analysis. Arterial-phase images were utilized to construct a model comprising 8 features for distinguishing between benign and malignant cases. The model achieved an accuracy of 0.891 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.816-0.996] in the cross-validation set and 0.553 (95% CI 0.360-0.745) in the test set. Conversely, employing 9 features from the venous-phase resulted in a model with a cross-validation accuracy of 0.862 (95%CI 0.777-0.946) and a test set accuracy of 0.801 (95% CI 0.653-0.950).Integrating the identified clinical features with imaging features yielded a model with a cross-validation accuracy of 0.934 (95% CI 0.879-0.990) and a test set accuracy of 0.904 (95% CI 0.808-0.999), thereby further improving its discriminatory ability. Our findings distinctly illustrate that venous-phase radiomics features eclipse arterial-phase radiomic features in terms of predictive accuracy regarding the nature of IPMNs. Furthermore, the synthesis and meticulous screening of clinical features with radiomic data significantly increased the diagnostic efficacy of our model, underscoring the pivotal importance of a comprehensive and integrated approach for accurate risk stratification in IPMN management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.