Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060383›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A data-centric machine learning approach to improve prediction of glioma grades using low-imbalance TCGA data.

Raquel Sánchez-Marqués, Vicente García, J Salvador Sánchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raquel Sánchez-MarquésFundación Estatal, Salud, Infancia y Bienestar Social, 28029, Madrid, Spain.
Vicente GarcíaDept. Electrical and Computer Engineering, Instituto de Ingeniería y Tecnología, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, 32310, Ciudad Juárez, Mexico. vicente.jimenez@uacj.mx.
J Salvador SánchezDept. Computer Languages and Systems, Institute of New Imaging Technologies, Universitat Jaume I, 12071, Castelló, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction and grading of gliomas play a crucial role in evaluating brain tumor progression, assessing overall prognosis, and treatment planning. In addition to neuroimaging techniques, identifying molecular biomarkers that can guide the diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of the response to therapy has aroused the interest of researchers in their use together with machine learning and deep learning models. Most of the research in this field has been model-centric, meaning it has been based on finding better performing algorithms. However, in practice, improving data quality can result in a better model. This study investigates a data-centric machine learning approach to determine their potential benefits in predicting glioma grades. We report six performance metrics to provide a complete picture of model performance. Experimental results indicate that standardization and oversizing the minority class increase the prediction performance of four popular machine learning models and two classifier ensembles applied on a low-imbalanced data set consisting of clinical factors and molecular biomarkers. The experiments also show that the two classifier ensembles significantly outperform three of the four standard prediction models. Furthermore, we conduct a comprehensive descriptive analysis of the glioma data set to identify relevant statistical characteristics and discover the most informative attributes using four feature ranking algorithms.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaMachine LearningNeoplasm GradingAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorClass imbalanceClinical factorsData-centric machine learningFeature rankingGlioma gradeMolecular biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID39060383
PMCPMC11282236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.