ReviewNature protocols2024
In vitro culture of cynomolgus monkey embryos from blastocyst to early organogenesis.
Review in Nature protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in stem cell-based embryo models and their applications in developmental biology and biomedicine.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026Review
- Identification of circadian rhythm-associated genes and therapeutic targets in myopia with dynamics simulation: a multiomics study using machine learning algorithms and Mendelian randomization.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Pooled CRISPR screens with joint single-nucleus chromatin accessibility and transcriptome profiling.Nature biotechnology · 2025Article
- Application of bioinformatics analysis to construct the prognostic model and immune-related gene characteristics of low-grade glioma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Nitrogen availability modulates carotene biosynthesis, chromoplast biogenesis, and cell wall composition in carrot callus.Plant cell reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human early embryonic development is the cornerstone of a healthy baby. Abnormal early embryonic development may lead to developmental and pregnancy-related disorders. Accordingly, understanding the developmental events and mechanisms of human early embryonic development is very important. However, attempts to reveal these events and mechanisms are greatly hindered by the extreme inaccessibility of in vivo early human embryos. Fortunately, the emergence of in vitro culture (IVC) systems for mammalian embryos provides an alternative strategy. In recent years, different two-dimensional and three-dimensional IVC systems have been developed for human embryos. Ethical limitations restrict the IVC of human embryos beyond 14 days, which makes non-human primate embryos an ideal model for studying primate developmental events. Different culture systems have supported the development of monkey embryos to days postfertilization 14 and 25, respectively. The successful recapitulation of in vivo developmental events by these IVC embryos has greatly enriched our understanding of human early embryonic development, which undoubtedly helps us to develop possible strategies to predict or treat various gestation-related diseases and birth defects. In this protocol, we establish different two-dimensional and three-dimensional IVC systems for primate embryos, provide step-by-step culture procedures and notes, and summarize the advantages and limitations of different culture systems. Replicating this protocol requires a moderate level of experience in mammalian embryo IVC, and the embryo culture requires strict adherence to the procedures we have described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39060382What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.