Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060364›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Detection, movement and persistence of invertebrate eDNA in groundwater.

K L Korbel, G C Hose, C Karwautz, P Greenfield, H Wang, A A Chariton, C Griebler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

K L KorbelSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. Kathryn.Korbel@mq.edu.au.
G C HoseSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
C KarwautzDepartment of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
P GreenfieldEnergy Business Unit, Common wealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Lindfield, New South Wales, Australia.
H WangDepartment of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
A A CharitonSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
C GrieblerDepartment of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Australian Research Council LP190100927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sampling groundwater biodiversity is difficult because of limited access and issues with species identification. Environmental DNA (eDNA) provides a viable alternative to traditional sampling approaches, however limited knowledge of the abundance and fate of DNA in groundwater hinders the interpretation of data from these environments. Groundwater environments are dark and have lower oxygen concentrations and microbial activity than surface waters. Consequently, assumptions about DNA fate in surface ecosystems may not apply to groundwaters. Here, we test the longevity and transport of eDNA in groundwater within a static microcosm and a flow-through mesocosm. A variety of invertebrates were placed within a mesocosm and microcosm to enable DNA shedding, and then removed. DNA persisted for up to 5 weeks after their removal in the static experiment and was detected between 9 and 33 days in the flow-through experiment. Sediments and water both proved important for eDNA detection. Crustacean DNA was detected sporadically and unpredictably, whereas non-crustacean DNA was detected more frequently despite their lower densities. We suggest that detecting crustaceans poses a challenge to utilising eDNA approaches for stygofauna monitoring. This is confounded by the scarcity of sequences for stygofauna in reference databases. Further research is needed before eDNA alone can be routinely employed for stygofauna detection.

Indexed as

DNA, EnvironmentalGroundwaterInvertebratesAnimalsBiodiversityCrustaceaEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringDNA, Environmental

Identifiers

PMID39060364
PMCPMC11282260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.