Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060354›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Possibility of brewery wastes application to soil as an organic improver of biological and chemical properties.

Jakub Kostecki, Andrzej Greinert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jakub KosteckiUniversity of Zielona Gora, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland. j.kostecki@iis.uz.zgora.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-4231-1080
Andrzej GreinertUniversity of Zielona Gora, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1194-2082

Funding

JPI Urban Europe/China collaboration UMO2018/29/Z/ST10/02986 NCN, Poland, 71961137011 NSFC, China, 870234 FFG, Austria
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil degradation, marked by declining organic matter, threatens global food security. The impact of brewer's spent yeast (BSY) on clay and sand was analysed at varying application rates to assess its effectiveness in improving soil quality. A randomized complete block design with three replicates was employed. One kilogram of soil were mixed with BSY at application rates of 2 t/ha and 5 t/ha. The samples were incubated at 26 °C for 5 months with daily watering. We analysed pH, total nitrogen, organic carbon, total phosphorus, and electrical conductivity (EC); microbial activity (total heterotrophic bacteria, actinobacteria, and fungi) and soil enzyme activity (dehydrogenase, catalase, protease). BSY application improved soil quality, particularly in clay. Clay showed increased in pH, EC, N and C. BSY significantly boosted microbial populations (bacteria, fungi) in clay with a lesser effect in sand. Enzyme activity and a fertility index also improved in BSY-treated clay, while sand displayed increased activity of a different enzyme. Results suggest BSY holds promise as an organic fertilizer, especially for clay soils. Further research is needed to optimize application, understand long-term effects, and evaluate economic feasibility and social acceptance. This study contributes to the search for sustainable, local solutions to improve soil health and agricultural practices.

Indexed as

SoilSoil MicrobiologyAgricultureBacteriaBeerCarbonClayElectric ConductivityFertilizersFungiHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationNitrogenPhosphorusSandCarbonClayFertilizersNitrogenPhosphorusSandSoilBrewer's spent yeast (BSY)Brewery wastesCircular economyR10 processSoil fertilisation

Identifiers

PMID39060354
PMCPMC11282282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.