Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060351›Full record

ReviewNPJ precision oncology2024

Radiology and multi-scale data integration for precision oncology.

Hania Paverd, Konstantinos Zormpas-Petridis, Hannah Clayton, Sarah Burge, Mireia Crispin-Ortuzar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hania PaverdCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Konstantinos Zormpas-PetridisFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Hannah ClaytonDepartment of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sarah BurgeCancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2506-927X
Mireia Crispin-OrtuzarDepartment of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. mc973@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4351-3709

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this Perspective paper we explore the potential of integrating radiological imaging with other data types, a critical yet underdeveloped area in comparison to the fusion of other multi-omic data. Radiological images provide a comprehensive, three-dimensional view of cancer, capturing features that would be missed by biopsies or other data modalities. This paper explores the complexities and challenges of incorporating medical imaging into data integration models, in the context of precision oncology. We present the different categories of imaging-omics integration and discuss recent progress, highlighting the opportunities that arise from bringing together spatial data on different scales.

Identifiers

PMID39060351
PMCPMC11282284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.