ArticleScientific reports2024
Exogenous variable driven deep learning models for improved price forecasting of TOP crops in India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Trajectory-Regularized Physics-Informed Hybrid Framework for Specialty Fresh Food Commodity Price Forecasting and Market Stability Monitoring.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Using deep learning models and exogenous production variables to forecast prices in the Brazilian sugarcane sector.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Time series forecasting of bed occupancy in mental health facilities in India using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Interval price prediction of livestock product based on fuzzy mathematics and improved LSTM.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately predicting agricultural commodity prices is crucial for India's economy. Traditional parametric models struggle with stringent assumptions, while machine learning (ML) approaches, though data-driven, lack automatic feature extraction. Deep learning (DL) models, with advanced feature extraction and predictive abilities, offer a promising solution. However, their application to agricultural price data ignored the exogenous factors. Hence, the study explored advanced versions of the well-known univariate models, NBEATSX and TransformerX. The research employed price data for essential crops like Tomato, Onion, and Potato (TOP) from major Indian markets and complemented it with corresponding weather data (precipitation and temperature). To provide a comprehensive analysis, the study also evaluated traditional statistical methods (ARIMAX and MLR) and a suite of ML algorithms (ANN, SVR, RFR, and XGBoost). The performance of these models was rigorously evaluated using error metrics like RMSE, MAE, sMAPE, MASE and QL. The findings were significant indicating DL models, particularly when augmented with exogenous variables, consistently outshone other methods with NBEATSX and TransformerX showing an average RMSE of 110.33 and 135.33, MAE of 60.08 and 74.92, sMAPE of 22.14 and 24.00, MASE of 1.02 and 1.32 and QL of 30.04 and 34.07, respectively. They exhibited lower error metrics, as compare to the statistical and ML models underscoring their effectiveness and potential in agricultural crop price forecasting. This study not only bridged a crucial research gap but also highlighted the robust potential of DL models in enhancing the accuracy of agricultural commodity price predictions in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.