ArticleScientific reports2024
Automation of customizable library preparation for next-generation sequencing into an open microfluidic platform.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Next-Generation Sequencing in Cardiovascular Disease: A New Era of Precision Cardiology.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Clinical metagenomics for diagnosis and surveillance of viral pathogens.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Review
- Genotyping by sequencing reveals a chromosome A04 QTL governing whitefly resistance in upland cotton.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Three-year nationwide survey of microbiology laboratory equipment conditions in China's CDC: setting new benchmarks.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is becoming more relevant for medical diagnostics, especially for using cell-free DNA to monitor response to therapy in cancer management, as high sensitivity of NGS enables detection of rare events. Sequencing Library preparation is a time-consuming and complex process, and large-scale liquid handlers are often used for automation. However, for smaller labs and low-to-medium throughput samples, these liquid handlers are expensive and need experts for handling. This work presents a proof-of-concept for library preparation on a commercially available and open lab-on-a-chip platform, which provides an alternative automation for low-to-medium throughput requirements. It covers common library preparation steps optimized to a microfluidic environment that include customizable PCR for target enrichment, end-repair, adapter ligation, nucleic acid purification via magnetic beads, and an integrated quantification step. The functionality of the cartridge is demonstrated with reference cfDNA containing different allelic frequencies of seven known mutations. Processing the samples in the cartridge reveals highly comparable results to manual processing (Pearson r = 0.94) based on amplicon sequencing. Summarized, the proposed automated lab-on-a-chip workflow for customizable library preparation could further pave the way for NGS to evolve from a technology used for research purposes to one that is applied in routine cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.