Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060307›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Enhancing gait recognition by multimodal fusion of mobilenetv1 and xception features via PCA for OaA-SVM classification.

Akash Pundir, Manmohan Sharma, Ankita Pundir, Dipen Saini, Khmaies Ouahada, Salil Bharany, Ateeq Ur Rehman, Habib Hamam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Akash PundirSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India.
Manmohan SharmaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India.
Ankita PundirSchool of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India.
Dipen SainiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India.
Khmaies OuahadaDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Science, School of Electrical Engineering, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, 2006, South Africa.
Salil BharanyInstitute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Chitkara University, Punjab, India. salil.bharany@gmail.com.
Ateeq Ur RehmanSchool of Computing, Gachon University, Seongnam, 13120, Republic of Korea. 202411144@gachon.ac.kr.
Habib HamamDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Science, School of Electrical Engineering, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, 2006, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait recognition has become an increasingly promising area of research in the search for noninvasive and effective methods of person identification. Its potential applications in security systems and medical diagnosis make it an exciting field with wide-ranging implications. However, precisely recognizing and assessing gait patterns is difficult, particularly in changing situations or from multiple perspectives. In this study, we utilized the widely used CASIA-B dataset to observe the performance of our proposed gait recognition model, with the aim of addressing some of the existing limitations in this field. Fifty individuals are randomly selected from the dataset, and the resulting data are split evenly for training and testing purposes. We begin by excerpting features from gait photos using two well-known deep learning networks, MobileNetV1 and Xception. We then combined these features and reduced their dimensionality via principal component analysis (PCA) to improve the model's performance. We subsequently assessed the model using two distinct classifiers: a random forest and a one against all support vector machine (OaA-SVM). The findings indicate that the OaA-SVM classifier manifests superior performance compared to the others, with a mean accuracy of 98.77% over eleven different viewing angles. This study is conducive to the development of effective gait recognition algorithms that can be applied to heighten people's security and promote their well-being.

Indexed as

GaitPrincipal Component AnalysisSupport Vector MachineAdultAlgorithmsDeep LearningFemaleHumansMalePattern Recognition, AutomatedBiometricDeep learningGaitHealthcareHuman identificationPretrained modelsSecurity

Identifiers

PMID39060307
PMCPMC11282096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.