ArticleNPJ breast cancer2024
Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and noncarriers.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Pathologic complete response and survival according to germline BRCA1/2 status in triple-negative breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Dynamic Assessment of Systemic Inflammatory Markers in Predicting Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Treatment in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of distinct genomic landscapes in young-onset gBRCA1/2 breast cancer.JCI insight · 2026Article
- The Potential Role of Vitamin D inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Molecular profile of residual triple-negative breast cancer: opportunities for post-neoadjuvant therapeutic interventions.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Level of estrogen receptor expression, histological grade, and computationally assessed stromal TILs on pre-treatment biopsies predict pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Pre-Treatment Breast MRI Features and ADC Values as Predictors of Pathologic Complete Response in Breast Cancer: A Molecular Subtype-Based Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- RAD51-based homologous recombination deficiency is associated with treatment response and survival in early breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Clinical outcome and proportion of hereditary cancer genes gPV in TNBC: the HEaRTBeat study.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Updating the Role of Carboplatin Added to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2025Review
- The role of genetics and epigenetics in breast cancer: A comprehensive review of metastasis, risk factors, and future perspectives.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER-2 negative breast cancer with HRR mutation.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy inExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Article
- Shifting the Paradigm: The Transformative Role of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Early Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers develop breast cancers with distinct pathological characteristics and mutational signatures that may result in differential response to chemotherapy. We compared rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) after NAC between BRCA1/2 variant carriers and noncarriers in a cohort of 1426 women (92 [6.5%] BRCA1 and 73 [5.1%] BRCA2) with clinical stage I-III breast cancer treated with NAC followed by surgery from 11/2013 to 01/2022 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The majority received doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/paclitaxel therapy (93%); BRCA1/2 carriers were more likely to receive carboplatin (p < 0.001). Overall, pCR was achieved in 42% of BRCA1 carriers, 21% of BRCA2 carriers, and 26% of noncarriers (p = 0.001). Among clinically node-positive (cN+) patients, nodal pCR was more frequent in BRCA1/2 carriers compared to noncarriers (53/96 [55%] vs. 371/856 [43%], p = 0.015). This difference was seen in HR+/HER2- (36% vs. 20% of noncarriers; p = 0.027) and TN subtypes (79% vs. 45% of noncarriers; p < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis of the overall cohort, BRCA1 status, and TN and HER2+ subtypes were independently associated with pCR. These data indicate that BRCA1 carriers may be more likely to achieve overall and nodal pCR in response to NAC compared with BRCA2 carriers and patients with sporadic disease. Further studies with a larger cohort of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are needed, as a small sample size may have a restricted ability to detect a significant association between mutational status and pCR in sensitivity analyses stratified by subtype and adjusted for clinically relevant factors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.