Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060173›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025

Associations of social engagement and loneliness with the progression and reversal of frailty: longitudinal investigations of 2 prospective cohorts from the UK and the USA.

Ziyi Cai, Anna Olia Papacosta, Lucy T Lennon, Peter H Whincup, Sasiwarang Goya Wannamethee, Eleanor M Simonsick, John C Mathers, Sheena E Ramsay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ziyi CaiPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5015-1833
Anna Olia PapacostaDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8781-6747
Lucy T LennonDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1738-1351
Peter H WhincupPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5589-4107
Sasiwarang Goya WannametheeDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9484-9977
Eleanor M SimonsickNational Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, NIH, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5460-3494
John C MathersPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3406-3002
Sheena E RamsayPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0391-9704

Funding

Health, Aging and Body Composition StudyZIAAG007390 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI LAUNER, LENORE J · 2009 to 2024
$4.0M
British Heart Foundation RG/08/013/25942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social connections may impact the dynamic trajectory of frailty. Using data from the British Regional Heart Study (BRHS) in the UK (n = 715) and the US Health, Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study (n = 1256), we conducted multinominal regression analyses to examine the association of baseline and change in social engagement and loneliness with progression to prefrailty and frailty, as well as their association with reversal to prefrailty and robust status among older adults. A higher level of social engagement at baseline (BRHS: relative risk ratio [RRR] 0.69 [95% CI, 0.55-0.85]; Health ABC: 0.56 [0.45-0.70]) and an increase in social engagement (BRHS: 0.73 [0.59-0.90]; Health ABC: 0.51 [0.41-0.63]) were associated with a lower risk of developing frailty. In BRHS, a higher level of loneliness at baseline (1.42 [1.10-1.83]) and an increase in loneliness (1.50 [1.18-1.90]) raised the risk of developing frailty. For reversal of frailty, higher social engagement at baseline (Health ABC: 1.63 [1.08-2.47]) and an increase in social engagement (BRHS: 1.74 [1.18-2.50]; Health ABC: 1.79 [1.17-.274]) were beneficial. Social connections may be potentially important and modifiable factors in both preventing and reversing progression of frailty in older adults.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyLonelinessSocial ParticipationAgedAged, 80 and overAgingDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProspective StudiesUnited KingdomUnited Statesagingcohort studyfrailtylonelinesssocial connectionssocial engagement

Identifiers

PMID39060173
PMCPMC11978614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.