Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39060029›Full record

ArticleGenome research2024

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning on large protein language models improves signal peptide prediction.

Shuai Zeng, Duolin Wang, Lei Jiang, Dong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In silico prediction of variant effects: promises and limitations for precision plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Breeding for Plant Disease Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuai ZengDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA.
Duolin WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA.
Lei JiangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA.
Dong XuDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA xudong@missouri.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4809-0514

Funding

Multi-view self-supervised deep learning for biological sequences and beyondR35GM126985 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI DONG XU · 2018 to 2026
$3.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Signal peptides (SPs) play a crucial role in protein translocation in cells. The development of large protein language models (PLMs) and prompt-based learning provide a new opportunity for SP prediction, especially for the categories with limited annotated data. We present a parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) framework for SP prediction, PEFT-SP, to effectively utilize pretrained PLMs. We integrated low-rank adaptation (LoRA) into ESM-2 models to better leverage the protein sequence evolutionary knowledge of PLMs. Experiments show that PEFT-SP using LoRA enhances state-of-the-art results, leading to a maximum Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) gain of 87.3% for SPs with small training samples and an overall MCC gain of 6.1%. Furthermore, we also employed two other PEFT methods, prompt tuning and adapter tuning, in ESM-2 for SP prediction. More elaborate experiments show that PEFT-SP using adapter tuning can also improve the state-of-the-art results by up to 28.1% MCC gain for SPs with small training samples and an overall MCC gain of 3.8%. LoRA requires fewer computing resources and less memory than the adapter tuning during the training stage, making it possible to adapt larger and more powerful protein models for SP prediction.

Indexed as

Protein Sorting SignalsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansProteinsProteinsProtein Sorting Signals

Identifiers

PMID39060029
PMCPMC11529868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.