Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39059811›Full record

Trial reportRMD open2024

Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to biological treatments: results through 5 years from the SELECT-BEYOND study.

Roy Fleischmann, Sebastian Meerwein, Christina Charles-Schoeman, Bernard Combe, Stephen Hall, Nasser Khan, Kyle M Carter, Heidi S Camp, Andrea Rubbert-Roth

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in RMD open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Roy FleischmannUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, Texas, USA rfleischmann@arthdocs.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6630-1477
Sebastian MeerweinAbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Christina Charles-SchoemanDivision of Rheumatology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1768-7019
Bernard CombeMontpellier University, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4002-1861
Stephen HallRheumatology, Emeritus Research and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nasser KhanAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Kyle M CarterAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Heidi S CampAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Andrea Rubbert-RothDivision of Rheumatology, Cantonal Clinic St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9016-2833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib over 5 years among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a long-term extension (LTE) of the SELECT-BEYOND phase 3 trial.

methodsPatients refractory to ≥1 biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) received upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg once daily or placebo, in combination with background conventional synthetic DMARD(s). At week 12, patients randomised to placebo were switched to upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg. All patients who completed the week 24 visit could enter the LTE for up to 5 years. Efficacy was analysed as observed and by non-responder imputation through week 260. Treatment-emergent adverse events per 100 patient-years were summarised over 5 years.

resultsOf the 498 patients randomised, 418 (84%) completed week 24 and entered the LTE. Of those who remained in the trial (n=80, upadacitinib 15 mg; n=81, upadacitinib 30 mg), 36%/36% and 81%/77% randomised to upadacitinib 15/30 mg were in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission or low disease activity at week 260, respectively (as observed). Approximately 47% of all patients who began in high disease activity demonstrated a CDAI improvement >12 at week 260 with upadacitinib 15/30 mg. Functional and pain-related outcomes also showed comparable improvements with both doses. Numerically higher rates of anaemia, herpes zoster and creatine phosphokinase elevation were observed with upadacitinib 30 mg vs 15 mg. No new safety issues were identified.

conclusionsUpadacitinib 15/30 mg continued to be effective in treating clinical and functional outcomes in patients with RA. The safety profile observed over 5 years was consistent with earlier study-specific and integrated assessments of upadacitinib treatment.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingupadacitinibAntirheumatic AgentsRheumatoid ArthritisTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID39059811
PMCPMC11284939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.