Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39059117›Full record

ArticleCognition2024

Flexible information-seeking in chimpanzees.

Alexandra G Rosati, Elisa Felsche, Megan F Cole, Rebeca Atencia, Joshua Rukundo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandra G RosatiDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: rosati@umich.edu.
Elisa FelscheDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Megan F ColeDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Rebeca AtenciaJane Goodall Institute - Congo, Pointe Noire, Congo.
Joshua RukundoNgamba Island Chimpanzee Sanctuary / Chimpanzee Trust, Entebbe, Uganda.

Funding

Cumulative Life Course Effects on Aging and Health in a Long-Lived Primate ModelR37AG049395 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Elizabeth Vinson Lonsdorf, Melissa Emery Thompson · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
Biodemography of Aging in Wild ChimpanzeesR01AG049395 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI MITANI, JOHN CARY, ROSATI, ALEXANDRA G · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049395NIA NIH HHS R37 AG049395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans can flexibly use metacognition to monitor their own knowledge and strategically acquire new information when needed. While humans can deploy these skills across a variety of contexts, most evidence for metacognition in animals has focused on simple situations, such as seeking out information about the location of food. Here, we examine the flexibility, breadth, and limits of this skill in chimpanzees. We tested semi-free-ranging chimpanzees on a novel task where they could seek information by standing up to peer into different containers. In Study 1, we tested n = 47 chimpanzees to assess if chimpanzees would spontaneously engage in information-seeking without prior experience, as well as to characterize individual variation in this propensity. We found that many chimpanzees engaged in information-seeking with minimal experience, and that younger chimpanzees and females were more likely to do so. In two subsequent studies, we then further tested chimpanzees who initially showed robust information-seeking on new variations of this task, to disentangle the cognitive processing shaping their behaviors. In Study 2, we examined how a subset of n = 12 chimpanzees applied these skills to seek information about the location versus the identity of rewards, and found that chimpanzees were equally adept at seeking out location and identity information. In Study 3, we examined whether a subset of n = 6 chimpanzees could apply these skills to make more efficacious decisions when faced with uncertainty about reward payoffs. Chimpanzees were able to use information-seeking to resolve risk and choose more optimally when faced with uncertain payoffs, although they often also engaged in information-seeking when it was not strictly necessary. These results identify core features of flexible metacognition that chimpanzees share with humans, as well as constraints that may represent key evolutionary shifts in human cognition.

Indexed as

Information Seeking BehaviorMetacognitionPan troglodytesAge FactorsAnimalsDecision MakingFoodHumansMaleRewardRisk ManagementUncertaintyComparative cognitionComparative developmentDecision-makingMetacognition

Identifiers

PMID39059117
PMCPMC11343684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.