Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39059006›Full record

ReviewInteractive journal of medical research2024

Digital Health Literacy and Its Association With Sociodemographic Characteristics, Health Resource Use, and Health Outcomes: Rapid Review.

Eva Yuen, Natalie Winter, Feby Savira, Catherine E Huggins, Lemai Nguyen, Paul Cooper, Anna Peeters, Kate Anderson, Rahul Bhoyroo, Sarah Crowe and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interactive journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Digital Divide Among U.S. Adults with and without Cancer: Prevalence and Associated Factors.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Cancer Education in the Age of TikTok and Social Media: Opportunity or Misinformation?Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eva YuenSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7956-5797
Natalie WinterSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1847-6862
Feby SaviraGlobal Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0383-812X
Catherine E HugginsGlobal Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3929-7756
Lemai NguyenCentre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3695-7245
Paul CooperSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8521-8946
Anna PeetersInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-9132
Kate AndersonSchool of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2747-0865
Rahul BhoyrooWestern Victoria Primary Health Network, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3025-6520
Sarah CroweWestern Victoria Primary Health Network, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8413-4919
Anna UgaldeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2473-8435

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health literacy has emerged as a critical skill set to navigate the digital age.

objectiveThis review sought to broadly summarize the literature on associations between digital health literacy and (1) sociodemographic characteristics, (2) health resource use, and (3) health outcomes in the general population, patient groups, or parent or caregiver groups.

methodsA rapid review of literature published between January 2016 and May 2022 was conducted through a search of 4 web-based databases. Articles were included on the basis of the following keywords: "measured digital health literacy," "digital literacy," "ehealth literacy," "e-health literacy," "electronic health literacy," or "internet health literacy" in adult populations; participants were from countries where English was the primary language; studies had to be cross-sectional, longitudinal, prospective, or retrospective, and published in English.

resultsThirty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. Evidence on the associations between digital health literacy and sociodemographic characteristics varied (27/36, 75% included studies), with higher education (16/21, 76.2% studies that examined the association) and younger age (12/21, 57.1% studies) tending to predict higher digital health literacy; however, other studies found no associations. No differences between genders were found across the majority of studies. Evidence across ethnic groups was too limited to draw conclusions; some studies showed that those from racial and ethnic minority groups had higher digital health literacy than White individuals, while other studies showed no associations. Higher digital health literacy was associated with digital health resource use in the majority of studies (20/36, 55.6%) that examined this relationship. In addition, higher digital health literacy was also associated with health outcomes across 3 areas (psychosocial outcomes; chronic disease and health management behaviors; and physical outcomes) across 17 included studies (17/36, 47.2%) that explored these relationships. However, not all studies on the relationship among digital health literacy and health resource use and health outcomes were in the expected direction.

conclusionsThe review presents mixed results regarding the relationship between digital health literacy and sociodemographic characteristics, although studies broadly found that increased digital health literacy was positively associated with improved health outcomes and behaviors. Further investigations of digital health literacy on chronic disease outcomes are needed, particularly across diverse groups. Empowering individuals with the skills to critically access and appraise reliable health information on digital platforms and devices is critical, given emerging evidence that suggests that those with low digital health literacy seek health information from unreliable sources. Identifying cost-effective strategies to rapidly assess and enhance digital health literacy capacities across community settings thus warrants continued investigation.

Indexed as

digital healthdigital health literacyeHealth literacyhealth informationhealth literacyweb-based database

Identifiers

PMID39059006
PMCPMC11316163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.