Observational studyRhode Island medical journal (2013)2024
Evaluation of a Child Abuse Screen Performed by Nurses Among Young Children with Fractures Seen in a Pediatric Emergency Department.
Observational study in Rhode Island medical journal (2013), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo assess institutional compliance with, and test characteristics of, a child abuse screen performed by emergency department (ED) nurses for children <5 years old who were diagnosed with fractures.
methodsA secondary analysis of a retrospective observational study of children 0-5 years old with fractures seen at a pediatric ED between January 2018 and April 2023 was performed. We analyzed demographics, ED visit data, and results of the nurse-completed abuse screen. Screen results were compared to ED clinician concern for abuse to calculate test characteristics.
resultsThe mean age of the 2,705 children identified was 38.4 months (SD 19.8). Out of the total patient cohort, 2,449 (90.5%) had a nurse-completed screen. Among these, 65 patients (2.4%) screened positive for possible abuse. We found no statistically significant difference in screen completion by age group, race, ethnicity, language, or insurance type. Of 312 (11.5%) encounters with clinician concern for abuse, 17.6% screened positive, 76.0% screened negative, and 6.4% had an incomplete screen. The sensitivity and specificity among screened children aged 0-5 were 19.2% [95% CI 14.7-23.8%] and 99.5% [95% CI 99.3-99.8%]. The PPV and NPV were 84.6% [95% CI 75.8-93.4%] and 90.3% [95% CI 89.1-91.5%]. Comparatively, among children <12 months, the sensitivity was 24.4% [95% CI 18.0-30.8%], specificity was 98.1% [95% CI 95.4-100%], PPV was 95.5% [95% CI 89.3-100%], and NPV was 43.7% [95% CI 37.3-50.1%].
conclusionsAlthough there was high compliance with this nurse-completed abuse screen, it is an inadequate sole modality for screening young children with fractures, with a low probability of a positive screen given clinician concern for potential abuse for the entire cohort and among high-risk infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39058986PMC11613661What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.