ReviewMedicine2024
Prenatal detection of distal 18p deletion by chromosomal microarray analysis: Three case reports and literature review.
Review in Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChromosome 18p deletion syndrome is caused by total or partial deletion of the short arm of chromosome 18 and associated with cognitive impairment, growth retardation and mild facial dysmorphism. However, most studies on the genotype-phenotype correlations in the 18p region are diagnosed postnatally. Prenatal reports involving 18p deletions are limited.
methodsThree pregnant women opted for invasive prenatal testing due to noninvasive prenatal testing indicating high risk for chromosome 18 abnormalities. Karyotypic analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were performed simultaneously. The pregnancy outcomes for all cases were followed up. Meanwhile, we also made a literature review on prenatal phenotypes of 18p deletions.
resultsG-banding analysis showed that 2 fetuses presented abnormal karyotypes: 45,XN,der(18)t(18;21)(p11; q11),-21 (case 2) and 46,XN,18p- (case 3). The karyotype of case 1 was normal. Meanwhile, CMA detected 4.37 Mb (case 1), 7.26 Mb (case 2) and 14.97 Mb (case 3) deletions in chromosome 18p region. All 3 pregnancies were terminated finally according to genetic counseling based upon abnormal CMA results.
conclusionPrenatal diagnosis of 18p deletion syndrome is full of challenges due to the phenotypic diversity, incomplete penetrance and lack of prenatal phenotypes. Increased nuchal translucency and holoprosencephaly are common prenatal phenotypes of distal 18p deletion. For fetuses carrying 18p deletions with atypical sonographic phenotypes, noninvasive prenatal testing could be adopted as an effective approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.