ArticlePloS one2024
Exploring and addressing the sexual and reproductive health and other related rights of transgender women in Bangladesh: A mixed methods protocol under the policy analysis framework.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTransgender women (hijra) in Bangladesh are declared as a separate gender category by the Government. However, research revealed that they experience transphobia, which could potentially affect their physical and mental health outcomes, and their access to SRHR-related care. This warrants an exploration of their SRHR-related rights issues, particularly using a community-engaged approach. Moreover, it is crucial to operationalize these findings into actionable policies and practice. This study aims to explore and address the SRHR and other rights-related challenges experienced by hijra under the framework of policy analysis.
methodsThe study population will include hijra in four selected service centers in Dhaka, Bangladesh. In the first phase, evidence will be generated through desk review and mixed methods research. The desk review will consist of reading and analyzing literature to understand the difference between policy and reality. For the quantitative component, a first-come-first-serve sampling approach will be used on a total sample size of 296. This will be complemented by the qualitative component, which will entail in-depth interviews, focus groups and key informant interviews. Moreover, life case histories will be conducted for particularly compelling cases. These findings will be collectively analyzed through the policy analysis framework, to analyze the differences between the policy and reality, which will ultimately generate a lay summary for stakeholders. Univariate and multivariate analysis will be used for the quantitative component whereas thematic analysis will be used for the qualitative component. In the second phase, the findings from the lay summary will be shared with stakeholders and hijra community members through a series of discussions. DISCUSSION: There are a few limitations of the study. In particular, this study consists of various activities which may require substantial time and effort to complete. Additionally, this study merely goes up to the policy recommendation formulation stage, as opposed to formulating an intervention design. Moreover, the findings will be disseminated through various platforms, including dissemination seminars, scientific articles and the study report.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.