Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39058697›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Trends in prevalence and correlates of tobacco use among school-going adolescents in Bhutan: A secondary data analysis of the 2004-2019 Global Youth Tobacco Survey.

Tshewang Gyeltshen, Mahbubur Rahman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tshewang GyeltshenGraduate School of Public Health, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9813-2225
Mahbubur RahmanGraduate School of Public Health, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tobacco use remains a major public health challenge globally. In Bhutan, despite the implementation of strict tobacco control measures, the tobacco uses among the students continue to be alarmingly high compared to neighboring countries. This study aims to analyze the trends and correlates of tobacco use among students in Bhutan, utilizing the nationally representative Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) data from multiple survey years. Secondary analyses of GYTS data collected during 2004-2019 with 12,594 students aged 11-18 years were employed. Use of tobacco was defined as either smoked or smokeless tobacco use in last 30 days of the survey. Prevalence was estimated over time and multivariable log-binomial regression was used to determine the correlates of current tobacco use. Overall tobacco use prevalence increased from 18.5% in 2004 to 27.3% in 2019. Males had higher prevalence (20.4% in 2019) than females (7.0% in 2019). Smokeless tobacco use increased substantially from 8.2% to 19.4% over the study period. Earlier age of initiation had adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 9.2 for <11 years and 12.8 for 13-16 years vs. never smoking), betel quid use (aOR 3.3), peer pressure (aOR 3.6), and lower cost were significant correlates of adolescent tobacco use. Despite tobacco control policies, tobacco use among Bhutanese students is high and has been increasing over time, especially smokeless forms. Tobacco uses regulation, targeted interventions for high-risk junior high school students, and addressing social influences are urgently needed to curb this epidemic. Sustained tobacco use surveillance and public health action is imperative to protect students in Bhutan from this harmful habit.

Identifiers

PMID39058697
PMCPMC11280154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.