Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39058694›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Study protocol for the Multimodal Approach to Preventing Suicide in Schools (MAPSS) project: A regionally based feasibility trial of an integrated response to suicide risk among UK secondary school pupils.

Emma Ashworth, Molly McCarthy, Sio Wynne, Jo Robinson, Samuel McKay, Steven Lane, Gerry Richardson, Neil Boardman, Kate Henderson, Vivienne Crosbie and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Emma AshworthSchool of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5279-4514
Molly McCarthySchool of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Sio WynneSchool of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Jo RobinsonOrygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Samuel McKayOrygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Steven LaneInstitute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Gerry RichardsonCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Neil BoardmanChamps Public Health Collaborative, Cheshire and Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Kate HendersonGrowth Mindset Therapy & Solutions, United Kingdom.
Vivienne CrosbieChild and Adolescent Mental Health Services, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Neil HumphreyManchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Sian YorkCalderstones School, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Maria MichailSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Damian HartMerseyside Youth Association, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
David ClacyPublic Advisors, United Kingdom.
Mani JalotaPublic Advisors, United Kingdom.
Pooja SainiSchool of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide is the leading cause of death of children and young people under 35 in the UK, and suicide rates are rising in this age group. Schools are considered an appropriate and logical setting for youth suicide prevention activities, with universal, selective, and indicated approaches all demonstrating efficacy. Given that international best practice recommends suicide prevention programmes combine these approaches, and that to date this has not been done in school settings in the UK, this study aims to evaluate the feasibility of delivering a suicide prevention programme incorporating universal, selective, and indicated components in UK schools.

methodsThis study is a feasibility cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) of an adapted version of the Multimodal Approach to Preventing Suicide in Schools (MAPSS) programme. The programme, initially developed in Australia, involves delivering universal psychoeducation to all pupils, screening them for suicide risk, and delivering Internet-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (Reframe IT-UK) to those students identified as being at high-risk for suicide. The programme will be trialled in six secondary schools in Northwest England and will target Year 10 students (14- and 15-year-olds). The primary aims are to assess: 1) the acceptability and safety of delivering MAPSS in a school setting in the UK; 2) the social validity of the MAPSS programme; and 3) the feasibility of delivering a large-scale, appropriately powered, cluster-RCT and economic evaluation of this intervention in the future. Secondary aims are to assess changes over time in mental health and wellbeing outcomes. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to evaluate a suicide prevention programme comprising universal, selective, and indicated components in UK schools. If the programme is found to be feasible, it could be more widely tested in schools and may ultimately lead to reduced rates of suicide and suicidal behaviour in young people.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesSchoolsStudentsSuicide PreventionAdolescentCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSchool Health ServicesSuicideUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID39058694
PMCPMC11280149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.