Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39058500›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2024

The Evolution of Ultraconserved Elements in Vertebrates.

Mitchell Cummins, Cadel Watson, Richard J Edwards, John S Mattick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Metamorphosis and lncRNAs: A Close Relationship.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Evolution of Bees: Insights from 'Omic Studies.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ultra-Conserved Poison Exons Enable Rapid and Safe Splicing Factor Gene Expression Switches: A Hypothesis.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Partitioned Multi-MUM finding for scalable pangenomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mitchell CumminsSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2797-3710
Cadel WatsonSchool of Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Richard J EdwardsSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3645-5539
John S MattickSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7680-7527

Funding

ARC Linkage Project LP180100721UNSW Sydney RG193211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultraconserved elements were discovered two decades ago, arbitrarily defined as sequences that are identical over a length ≥ 200 bp in the human, mouse, and rat genomes. The definition was subsequently extended to sequences ≥ 100 bp identical in at least three of five mammalian genomes (including dog and cow), and shown to have undergone rapid expansion from ancestors in fish and strong negative selection in birds and mammals. Since then, many more genomes have become available, allowing better definition and more thorough examination of ultraconserved element distribution and evolutionary history. We developed a fast and flexible analytical pipeline for identifying ultraconserved elements in multiple genomes, dedUCE, which allows manipulation of minimum length, sequence identity, and number of species with a detectable ultraconserved element according to specified parameters. We suggest an updated definition of ultraconserved elements as sequences ≥ 100 bp and ≥97% sequence identity in ≥50% of placental mammal orders (12,813 ultraconserved elements). By mapping ultraconserved elements to ∼200 species, we find that placental ultraconserved elements appeared early in vertebrate evolution, well before land colonization, suggesting that the evolutionary pressures driving ultraconserved element selection were present in aquatic environments in the Cambrian-Devonian periods. Most (>90%) ultraconserved elements likely appeared after the divergence of gnathostomes from jawless predecessors, were largely established in sequence identity by early Sarcopterygii evolution-before the divergence of lobe-finned fishes from tetrapods-and became near fixed in the amniotes. Ultraconserved elements are mainly located in the introns of protein-coding and noncoding genes involved in neurological and skeletomuscular development, enriched in regulatory elements, and dynamically expressed throughout embryonic development.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceEvolution, MolecularVertebratesAnimalsGenomeHumansPhylogenyconservationnoncodingtetrapodsultraconserved elements

Identifiers

PMID39058500
PMCPMC11276968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.