ArticleJAMA network open2024
Development of an Automated Free Flap Monitoring System Based on Artificial Intelligence.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of AI in Prediction and Assessment of Compromised Free Flaps: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Learning Curve and Technical Strategies in 100 Consecutive Head and Neck Free-Flap Reconstructions by an Early-Career Plastic Surgeon.Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- The Gemini Eye in Microsurgery: Video-Based Capillary Refill and Chromatic Assessment for Free Flap Monitoring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Identifying Venous Insufficiency in Head and Neck Reconstruction Flaps Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods.Head & neck · 2026Article
- Free-style perforator-based hatchet flap: a novel and innovative approach for superior aesthetic outcomes in facial defect reconstruction.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- [Current applications and prospects of artificial intelligence in burn diagnosis and treatment].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Review
- Detection of Microvascular Failure Using Bioimpedance and Sensor-derived Clinical Indicators: A Preliminary Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Research progress in flap temperature monitoring technologies and applications after transplantation.APL bioengineering · 2026Review
- Transforming perioperative care: The current landscape and future trajectory of artificial intelligence in anesthesia-A narrative review.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- [A brief discussion on microsurgery techniques and free perforator flaps for wound repair].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Article
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2026Article
- [Emphasizing evolution of key technological elements in reconstructive surgery].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in breast surgery: Current applications, challenges, and future perspectives.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- A remote monitoring system based on deep learning for real-time assessment of free flaps.PloS one · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Breast Reconstruction: Enhancing Surgical Planning, Aesthetic Outcomes, and Patient-Centered Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Reconstructive Microsurgery.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2025Review
- Auto-Segmentation via deep-learning approaches for the assessment of flap volume after reconstructive surgery or radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Breast Reconstruction: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- The Current State of the Art in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Review and Modern/Future Approaches.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Meticulous postoperative flap monitoring is essential for preventing flap failure and achieving optimal results in free flap operations, for which physical examination has remained the criterion standard. Despite the high reliability of physical examination, the requirement of excessive use of clinician time has been considered a main drawback. Objective: To develop an automated free flap monitoring system using artificial intelligence (AI), minimizing human involvement while maintaining efficiency. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prognostic study, the designed system involves a smartphone camera installed in a location with optimal flap visibility to capture photographs at regular intervals. The automated program identifies the flap area, checks for notable abnormalities in its appearance, and notifies medical staff if abnormalities are detected. Implementation requires 2 AI-based models: a segmentation model for automatic flap recognition in photographs and a grading model for evaluating the perfusion status of the identified flap. To develop this system, flap photographs captured for monitoring were collected from patients who underwent free flap-based reconstruction from March 1, 2020, to August 31, 2023. After the 2 models were developed, they were integrated to construct the system, which was applied in a clinical setting in November 2023. Exposure: Conducting the developed automated AI-based flap monitoring system. Main Outcomes and Measures: Accuracy of the developed models and feasibility of clinical application of the system. Results: Photographs were obtained from 305 patients (median age, 62 years [range, 8-86 years]; 178 [58.4%] were male). Based on 2068 photographs, the FS-net program (a customized model) was developed for flap segmentation, demonstrating a mean (SD) Dice similarity coefficient of 0.970 (0.001) with 5-fold cross-validation. For the flap grading system, 11 112 photographs from the 305 patients were used, encompassing 10 115 photographs with normal features and 997 with abnormal features. Tested on 5506 photographs, the DenseNet121 model demonstrated the highest performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.960 (95% CI, 0.951-0.969). The sensitivity for detecting venous insufficiency was 97.5% and for arterial insufficiency was 92.8%. When applied to 10 patients, the system successfully conducted 143 automated monitoring sessions without significant issues. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that a novel automated system may enable efficient flap monitoring with minimal use of clinician time. It may be anticipated to serve as an effective surveillance tool for postoperative free flap monitoring. Further studies are required to verify its reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.