Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39058486›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Development of an Automated Free Flap Monitoring System Based on Artificial Intelligence.

Jisu Kim, Sang Mee Lee, Da Eun Kim, Sungjin Kim, Myung Jin Chung, Zero Kim, Taeyoung Kim, Kyeong-Tae Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Current applications and prospects of artificial intelligence in burn diagnosis and treatment].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2026
    Article
  12. [Emphasizing evolution of key technological elements in reconstructive surgery].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jisu KimDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sang Mee LeeDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.
Da Eun KimDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sungjin KimBanobagi Plastic Surgery Clinic, Seoul, South Korea.
Myung Jin ChungDepartment of Data Convergence and Future Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Zero KimMedical AI Research Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Taeyoung KimMedical AI Research Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyeong-Tae LeeDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Meticulous postoperative flap monitoring is essential for preventing flap failure and achieving optimal results in free flap operations, for which physical examination has remained the criterion standard. Despite the high reliability of physical examination, the requirement of excessive use of clinician time has been considered a main drawback. Objective: To develop an automated free flap monitoring system using artificial intelligence (AI), minimizing human involvement while maintaining efficiency. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prognostic study, the designed system involves a smartphone camera installed in a location with optimal flap visibility to capture photographs at regular intervals. The automated program identifies the flap area, checks for notable abnormalities in its appearance, and notifies medical staff if abnormalities are detected. Implementation requires 2 AI-based models: a segmentation model for automatic flap recognition in photographs and a grading model for evaluating the perfusion status of the identified flap. To develop this system, flap photographs captured for monitoring were collected from patients who underwent free flap-based reconstruction from March 1, 2020, to August 31, 2023. After the 2 models were developed, they were integrated to construct the system, which was applied in a clinical setting in November 2023. Exposure: Conducting the developed automated AI-based flap monitoring system. Main Outcomes and Measures: Accuracy of the developed models and feasibility of clinical application of the system. Results: Photographs were obtained from 305 patients (median age, 62 years [range, 8-86 years]; 178 [58.4%] were male). Based on 2068 photographs, the FS-net program (a customized model) was developed for flap segmentation, demonstrating a mean (SD) Dice similarity coefficient of 0.970 (0.001) with 5-fold cross-validation. For the flap grading system, 11 112 photographs from the 305 patients were used, encompassing 10 115 photographs with normal features and 997 with abnormal features. Tested on 5506 photographs, the DenseNet121 model demonstrated the highest performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.960 (95% CI, 0.951-0.969). The sensitivity for detecting venous insufficiency was 97.5% and for arterial insufficiency was 92.8%. When applied to 10 patients, the system successfully conducted 143 automated monitoring sessions without significant issues. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that a novel automated system may enable efficient flap monitoring with minimal use of clinician time. It may be anticipated to serve as an effective surveillance tool for postoperative free flap monitoring. Further studies are required to verify its reliability.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceFree Tissue FlapsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicPhotographyPlastic Surgery ProceduresReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39058486
PMCPMC11282448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.