Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39058452›Full record

ArticleJournal of Parkinson's disease2024

Modeling of Parkinson's Disease Progression and Implications for Detection of Disease Modification in Treatment Trials.

Benjamin Ribba, Tanya Simuni, Kenneth Marek, Andrew Siderowf, Cheikh Diack, Philippe Bernard Pierrillas, Annabelle Monnet, Benedicte Ricci, Tania Nikolcheva, Gennaro Pagano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A double-blind, controlled trial of circadian effective light therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. One-Year Substantia NigraMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Benjamin RibbaRoche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Tanya SimuniDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kenneth MarekInstitute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, CT, USA.
Andrew SiderowfDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cheikh DiackRoche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Philippe Bernard PierrillasRoche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Annabelle MonnetRoche Product Development, F. Hoffmann La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Benedicte RicciRoche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Tania NikolchevaRoche Product Development, F. Hoffmann La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Gennaro PaganoRoche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Objectively measuring Parkinson's disease (PD) signs and symptoms over time is critical for the successful development of treatments aimed at halting the disease progression of people with PD. Objective: To create a clinical trial simulation tool that characterizes the natural history of PD progression and enables a data-driven design of randomized controlled studies testing potential disease-modifying treatments (DMT) in early-stage PD. Methods: Data from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) were analyzed with nonlinear mixed-effect modeling techniques to characterize the progression of MDS-UPDRS part I (non-motor aspects of experiences of daily living), part II (motor aspects of experiences of daily living), and part III (motor signs). A clinical trial simulation tool was built from these disease models and used to predict probability of success as a function of trial design. Results: MDS-UPDRS part III progresses approximately 3 times faster than MDS-UPDRS part II and I, with an increase of 3 versus 1 points/year. Higher amounts of symptomatic therapy is associated with slower progression of MDS-UPDRS part II and III. The modeling framework predicts that a DMT effect on MDS-UPDRS part III could precede effect on part II by approximately 2 to 3 years. Conclusions: Our clinical trial simulation tool predicted that in a two-year randomized controlled trial, MDS-UPDRS part III could be used to evaluate a potential novel DMT, while part II would require longer trials of a minimum duration of 3 to 5 years underscoring the need for innovative trial design approaches including novel patient-centric measures.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionParkinson DiseaseActivities of Daily LivingAgedComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDisease modificationendpointsfunctional impairmentMDS-UPDRSmotor signsnatural disease progressionPPMIprobability of study success

Identifiers

PMID39058452
PMCPMC11380229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.