Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39058366›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gynecologic oncology2025

The role of radiomics for predicting of lymph-vascular space invasion in cervical cancer patients based on artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mengli Zhao, Zhen Li, Xiaowei Gu, Xiaojing Yang, Zhongrong Gao, Shanshan Wang, Jie Fu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. PET-CT radiomics and artificial intelligence for predicting lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mengli Zhao *Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6337-7516
Zhen Li *ENT institute and Department of Otolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9395-8004
Xiaowei GuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jiangyin Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, Jiangyin, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8501-5305
Xiaojing YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4881-9771
Zhongrong GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0000-0312-3418
Shanshan WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1790-3359
Jie FuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. fujie74@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3183-453X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to conduct a methodical examination and assessment of the prognostic efficacy exhibited by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived radiomic models concerning the preoperative prediction of lymph-vascular space infiltration (LVSI) in cervical cancer cases. A comprehensive and thorough exploration of pertinent academic literature was undertaken by two investigators, employing the resources of the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. The scope of this research was bounded by a publication cutoff date of May 15, 2023. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies that utilized radiomic models based on MRI to prognosticate the accuracy of preoperative LVSI estimation in instances of cervical cancer. The Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 framework and the Radiomic Quality Score metric were employed. This investigation included nine distinct research studies, enrolling a total of 1,406 patients. The diagnostic performance metrics of MRI-based radiomic models in the prediction of preoperative LVSI among cervical cancer patients were determined as follows: sensitivity of 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]=77%-87%), specificity of 74% (95% CI=69%-79%), and a corresponding AUC of summary receiver operating characteristic measuring 0.86 (95% CI=0.82-0.88). The results of the synthesized meta-analysis did not reveal substantial heterogeneity.This meta-analysis suggests the robust diagnostic proficiency of the MRI-based radiomic model in the prognostication of preoperative LVSI within the cohort of cervical cancer patients. In the future, radiomics holds the potential to emerge as a widely applicable noninvasive modality for the early detection of LVSI in the context of cervical cancer.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMagnetic Resonance ImagingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisRadiomicsArtificial IntelligenceCervical CancerDeep LearningLymph-Vascular Space InfiltrationMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39058366
PMCPMC11964972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.