Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39058348›Full record

ReviewJournal of periodontal & implant science2025

Saliva assay: a call for methodological standardization.

Hyeong-Jin Baek, Keun-Suh Kim, MinJeong Kwoen, Eun-Sun Park, Hyo-Jung Lee, Kyoung-Un Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of periodontal & implant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Dentistry journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hyeong-Jin BaekDepartment of Periodontology, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5378-9784
Keun-Suh KimDepartment of Periodontology, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5986-4810
MinJeong KwoenDepartment of Periodontology, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0246-4090
Eun-Sun ParkMedical Library, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0952-1374
Hyo-Jung LeeDepartment of Periodontology, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. periolee@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0439-7389
Kyoung-Un ParkDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. m91w95pf@snu.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2402-7633

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2021R1A2C1006466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The oral cavity provides an ideal environment for microorganisms, including bacteria, viruses, and fungi, to flourish. Increasing attention has been focused on the connection between the oral microbiome and both oral and systemic diseases, spurring active research into the collection and analysis of specimens for healthcare purposes. Among the various methods for analyzing the oral microbiome, saliva analysis is especially prominent. Saliva samples, which can be collected non-invasively, provide information on the systemic health and oral microbiome composition of an individual. This review was performed to evaluate the current state of the relevant research through an examination of the literature and to suggest an appropriate assay method for investigating the oral microbiome. We analyzed articles published in English in SCI(E) journals after January 1, 2000, ultimately selecting 53 articles for review. Articles were identified through keyword searches in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases. Three experienced researchers conducted full-text assessments following title and abstract screening to select appropriate papers. Subsequently, they organized and analyzed the desired data. Our review revealed that most studies utilized unstimulated saliva samples for oral microbiome analysis. Of the 53 studies examined, 29 identified relationships between the oral microbiome and various diseases, such as oral disease, Behçet disease, cancer, and oral lichen planus. However, the studies employed diverse methods of collection and analysis, which compromised the reliability and accuracy of the findings. To address the limitations caused by methodological inconsistencies, a standardized saliva assay should be established.

Indexed as

MicrobiomeOral cavityReviewSaliva

Identifiers

PMID39058348
PMCPMC11885870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.