ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Establishment of a Suitable Diagnostic Workflow to Ensure Sensitive Detection of African Swine Fever Virus Genome in Porcine Semen.
Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infection of the Conceptus With African Swine Fever Virus Following Artificial Insemination in Sows: A Pathological Study.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Implications for safety:Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparison of DNA extraction methods for detecting African swine fever virus in feed and environmental samples.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid spread of African swine fever virus (ASFV), causing severe and often lethal disease in domestic pigs and Eurasian wild boar, continues to be a threat to pig populations and dependent industries. Despite scientific achievements that have deepened our understanding of ASFV pathogenesis, alternative transmission routes for ASFV remain to be elucidated. We previously demonstrated the efficient transmission of ASFV from infected boars to naïve recipient gilts via artificial insemination, thereby highlighting the importance of surveillance of boar semen prior to its shipment. Since the accurate and reliable detection of even low amounts of ASFV in boar semen is key to disease prevention and control, we established a suitable diagnostic workflow to efficiently detect the ASFV genome in boar semen. Here, we assessed the sensitivity of various routine nucleic acid extraction kits as well as qPCR protocols in detecting the ASFV genome in the blood and semen of infected boars. The feasibility of the respective kits and methods for future use in boar studs was also considered. Variability in sensitivity mostly concerned samples with low to very low amounts of the ASFV genome. Ultimately, we defined a well-suited workflow for precisely detecting the ASFV genome in boar semen as early as 2 days post ASFV infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.