Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39057743›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2024

Reducing Manual Annotation Costs for Cell Segmentation by Upgrading Low-Quality Annotations.

Serban Vădineanu, Daniël M Pelt, Oleh Dzyubachyk, Kees Joost Batenburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Serban VădineanuLeiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, Leiden University, 2311 EZ Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1673-9315
Daniël M PeltLeiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, Leiden University, 2311 EZ Leiden, The Netherlands.
Oleh DzyubachykThe Division of Image Processing, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1344-7189
Kees Joost BatenburgLeiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, Leiden University, 2311 EZ Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep-learning algorithms for cell segmentation typically require large data sets with high-quality annotations to be trained with. However, the annotation cost for obtaining such sets may prove to be prohibitively expensive. Our work aims to reduce the time necessary to create high-quality annotations of cell images by using a relatively small well-annotated data set for training a convolutional neural network to upgrade lower-quality annotations, produced at lower annotation costs. We investigate the performance of our solution when upgrading the annotation quality for labels affected by three types of annotation error: omission, inclusion, and bias. We observe that our method can upgrade annotations affected by high error levels from 0.3 to 0.9 Dice similarity with the ground-truth annotations. We also show that a relatively small well-annotated set enlarged with samples with upgraded annotations can be used to train better-performing cell segmentation networks compared to training only on the well-annotated set. Moreover, we present a use case where our solution can be successfully employed to increase the quality of the predictions of a segmentation network trained on just 10 annotated samples.

Indexed as

annotation enhancementannotation errorscell segmentationdeep learning

Identifiers

PMID39057743
PMCPMC11278254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.